Aces 101 Assigmnet 3 edited.docx - gmosandwhytherenotsogood


Dec 12, 2012 (8 years and 10 months ago)


Alex Tebbe, Alonso Ledesma, Sunny Kato, Jenny Mleczko, and Jack Plunk

Section AD1

Assignment 3

GMO Crops: The Risk

GMO is an acronym that stands for genetically modified organisms.
The term is used when

scientist take
an organism’s DNA and modifies it
to have
certain desirable characteristics
. The traits can
vary from


resistance against certain pests or pesticides, increasing

nutritional value,


altering size

color. The process of taking specific genes from one plant and transferring them into

another plant
is not
and requires
the need of
human assistance and technology.
In 2009, it was
estimated that 14 million farmers planted 330 million acres with genetically modified crops (GMO
Evidently, GMOs are
covering mor
e than ha
lf of the earth’s farmable land. Around 90% of the
substantial population of people that consume these products

either do not know what exactly they

consuming or know very little about genetically engineer crops (

It is crucial

for pe
ople to
become aware and informed of what they are

and the possible

consequences. These
consequences include the

long term
effects GMO’s could have on the
environment, native
organisms and

plants, and, most important
, the human populatio
n. The inhabitants of this earth need
to stop genetically engineering crops before the long term effects wreak havoc for future generations.

Some say GMO’s could be beneficial to society for several reasons. For example,


developed crops t
hat are resistant to herbicides and pesticides. Widely known examples of chemically
resistant seeds are “Round Up Ready” seeds and Bt
corn . These
seeds, when

, can give the

the ability to spray preventative chemicals

like herbicides and pes
ticides immedia
tely after the
crop is planted, which normally would kill the crop.
Another benefit of using genetically engineered
crops is that scientist

can develop crops that can withstand certain weather conditions. In turn, farmers
in different parts

of the world ca
n grow a wide variety of plants that normally would not be able to
survive in those parts of the world because of the climate. Genetic engineering could also help

crops to
sustain productivity in extreme or abnormal conditions where the cro
p is normally grown. All these
benefits lower cost for the farmers and increase productivity.

However, these are all just possibilities. With future consequences still unknown, crossing the
biological barrier and messing with the genetic makeup of an orga
nism can result in a disaster. There
still too
many downfalls of growing and consuming GMO crops.
One big downfall is in the process


can end up in unexpected places, mutate with harmful effects, or turn off previously suppressed genes.
This woul
d lead to mysterious genes and traits being turned on that are not supposed to be, which could
lead to unwanted and extremely risky effects.
For example, weeds and certain pests that have negative
effects on crops can also become resistant to chemicals t
t were once used to kill them

which would
lead to the use of even more harmful and stronger chemicals to combat the effects.

GMOs also can
cause wide ranged damage to the environment. The new organisms can sterilize soil of nitrogen and
other valuable nut
rients important for growing crops, or they can release harmful toxins
in the soil.
Along with damaging
soils, the increase of GMO’s has increased the use of chemicals on crops leading to
contamination of waterways and
the poisoning

of other
animals and

plants in the food web. For

in Britain, a native farm bird, the Skylark, was indirectly affected by the introduction of GM sugar
beets designed to resist herbicides. In planting this crop, the weeds were reduced substantially. However,
since the
birds rely on the seeds of this weed in autumn and winter, researchers expect that up to 80% of
the Skylark population would have to find other means of finding food
, leading to the possibility of
starvation if not enough food could be found



Engineering is fundamentally diff
from traditional methods, counter to the argument that the manipulation of genes has been around for
millennium through the use of natural selection and isolation to an advantage.
Now instead

of just
farmers growin
g crops, using the naturally better species and seeds to better their production,
are developing new plants and organisms

through penetrating genetic manipulation

The downfall is
when scientists
make mistakes and mutate a plant the effects are
permanent and cannot be reversed

the genetic genotype has already been created


of using GMOs is the insufficient
research. Since genetically engineering
crops is relatively new and new methods keep emerging,
scientist have not been given

enough time to research or predict the long term effects
these crops
would have on humans and other organisms
. Many scientist

already found that ce
rtain crops
consumed can cause different types of


in humans, resistance to certain antibiotics, a
nd transfer
of allergenic genes

and these are only the semi
controlled effects that emerged right away (
the GMO arguments: against
). This does not include uncontrolled and unpredicted risks that go along
with the geneti
c manipulation and the introduction to the environment, along with the interactions of
genetically manipulated organisms with natural born, native ones.

So before big time companies go out and start playing with genetics and crossing biological
, serious consequences must be taken into consideration. Without enough research GM crops
can lead to hazardous consequences that may lead to disastrous effects in on the environment, human
life, and native organisms. Only after extensive research and long

term experimentation could bring
about the possibility of safe GM crop usage. Even then, the future can never be fully predicted. For now,
there are too many “I don’t knows” when it comes to the genetic modification of crops.
engineered crops
could change the world drastically

problems may be solved or tragic disasters may
emerge. So, is it worth the risk?