Polarization converters based on axially symmetric twisted nematic liquid crystal

giantsneckspiffyElectronics - Devices

Oct 13, 2013 (4 years and 9 months ago)


Polarization converters based on axially
symmetric twisted nematic liquid crystal
Shih-Wei Ko
, Chi-Lun Ting
, Andy Y.-G. Fuh
, and Tsung-Hsien Lin

Institute of Electro-optical Science and Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, China
Department of Physics, Institute of Electro-Optical Science and Engineering, and Advanced Optoelectronic
Technology Center, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan 701, China
Department of Photonics, National Sun Yat-Sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 804, China
Abstract: An axially symmetric twisted nematic liquid crystal (ASTNLC)
device, based on axially symmetric photoalignment, was demonstrated.
Such an ASTNLC device can convert axial (azimuthal) to azimuthal (axial)
polarization. The optical properties of the ASTNLC device are analyzed and
found to agree with simulation results. The ASTNLC device with a specific
device can be adopted as an arbitrary axial symmetric polarization converter
or waveplate for axially, azimuthally or vertically polarized light. A design
for converting linear polarized light to axially symmetric circular polarized
light is also demonstrated.
©2010 Optical Society of America
OCIS codes: (160.3710) Liquid crystals; (220.1140) Alignment
References and links
1. R. Bhandari, “Polarization of light and topological phases,” Phys. Rep. 281(1), 1–64 (1997).
2. Z. Bomzon, G. Biener, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Space-variant Pancharatnam-Berry phase optical elements
with computer-generated subwavelength gratings,” Opt. Lett. 27(13), 1141–1143 (2002).
3. A. Jesacher, A. Schwaighofer, S. Fürhapter, C. Maurer, S. Bernet, and M. Ritsch-Marte, “Wavefront correction
of spatial light modulators using an optical vortex image,” Opt. Express 15(9), 5801–5808 (2007).
4. G. A. Swartzlander, Jr., “Peering into darkness with a vortex spatial filter,” Opt. Lett. 26(8), 497–499 (2001).
5. S. Bernet, A. Jesacher, S. Fürhapter, C. Maurer, and M. Ritsch-Marte, “Quantitative imaging of complex samples
by spiral phase contrast microscopy,” Opt. Express 14(9), 3792–3805 (2006).
6. A. V. Nesterov, and V. G. Niziev, “Laser beams with axially symmetric polarization,” Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
33(15), 1817–1822 (2000).
7. J. H. Lee, H. R. Kim, and S. D. Lee, “Polarization-insensitive wavelength selection in an axially symmetric
liquid-crystal Fabry-Perot filter,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 75(6), 859–861 (1999).
8. G. Sinclair, P. Jordan, J. Courtial, M. Padgett, J. Cooper, and Z. J. Laczik, “Assembly of 3-dimensional
structures using programmable holographic optical tweezers,” Opt. Express 12(22), 5475–5480 (2004).
9. S. C. Chapin, V. Germain, and E. R. Dufresne, “Automated trapping, assembly, and sorting with holographic
optical tweezers,” Opt. Express 14(26), 13095–13100 (2006).
10. R. Yamaguchi, T. Nose, and S. Sato, “Liquid crystal polarizers with axially symmetrical properties,” Jpn. J.
Appl. Phys. 28(9), 1730–1731 (1989).
11. M. Stalder, and M. Schadt, “Linearly polarized light with axial symmetry generated by liquid-crystal polarization
converters,” Opt. Lett. 21(23), 1948–1950 (1996).
12. A. Niv, G. Biener, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Formation of linearly polarized light with axial symmetry by use
of space-variant subwavelength gratings,” Opt. Lett. 28(7), 510–512 (2003).
13. S. Nersisyan, N. Tabiryan, D. M. Steeves, and B. R. Kimball, “Fabrication of liquid crystal polymer axial
waveplates for UV-IR wavelengths,” Opt. Express 17(14), 11926–11934 (2009).
14. A. Niv, G. Biener, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Manipulation of the Pancharatnam phase in vectorial vortices,”
Opt. Express 14(10), 4208–4220 (2006).
15. L.-C. Lin, H.-C. Jau, T.-H. Lin, and A. Y.-G. Fuh, “Highly efficient and polarization-independent Fresnel lens
based on dye-doped liquid crystal,” Opt. Express 15(6), 2900–2906 (2007).
16. C.-R. Lee, T.-S. Mo, K.-T. Cheng, T.-L. Fu, and A. Y.-G. Fuh, “Electrically switchable and thermally erasable
biphotonic holographic gratings in dye-doped liquid crystal films,” Appl. Phys. Lett. 83(21), 4285–4287 (2003).
17. Y.-Y. Tzeng, S.-W. Ke, C.-L. Ting, A. Y.-G. Fuh, and T.-H. Lin, “Axially symmetric polarization converters
based on photo-aligned liquid crystal films,” Opt. Express 16(6), 3768–3775 (2008).

1. Introduction
An axially symmetric liquid crystal (LC) structure can be adopted as spatial polarization
converter and axial waveplate. Such waveplates present a valuable photonics tool for beam
shaping [1–3], imaging [4,5], laser material processing [6], spectral filtering [7] and optical
tweezer applications [8,9]. An attractive characteristic of the axially-symmetric LC structure
is that the device is independent of a linearly polarized incident beam, because the LC
directors are oriented symmetrically in the azimuthal directions. The potential for developing
space-variant polarized light and axially symmetry devices is increasing [10–12].
Many approaches for producing axially symmetric polarization have been studied .They
include the use of special LC cells with circular rubbing [10, 11] or subwavelength gratings
[12]. However, these approaches depend on a complex fabricating procedure, such as circular
rubbing or micro-fabrication. Tuning the polarization state of these axially symmetric devices
is difficult. Another approach for fabricating an axial waveplate is based on a liquid crystal
polymer (LCP) [13]. The major disadvantage of this method is that the phase retardation
cannot be tuned using one cell, and the fabrication process is too complex to match to a
particular wavelength.
This work presents an axially symmetric twisted nematic liquid crystal (ASTNLC) device
that is based on axially symmetrical photoalignment in azo dye-doped liquid crystal films.
The structure of the ASTNLC is analyzed and compared with a simulation result. Such
ASTNLC devices can be adopted as tunable polarization converters or waveplates for axially,
azimuthally and vertically polarized light.
2. Device fabrication
The LC and azo dye that are adopted in this experiment were E7 (Merck) and Methyl Red
(MR; Aldrich), respectively. The MR:E7 mixing ratio was 1:99 wt%. Two indium-tin-oxide
(ITO)-coated glass slides, separated by 12um ball spacers, were adopted to fabricate an empty
cell. No surface treatment was applied to the two cleaned glass slides. The homogeneously
mixed MR/E7 compound was then injected into an empty cell in the isotropic state to generate
a dye-doped liquid crystal (DDLC) sample.
In this work, the non-contact photoalignment method was adopted to produce an axial
symmetric LC conformation. As described elsewhere in a previous work [14], the MR dyes
undergo trans–cis isomerization, and then molecular reorientation occurs continuously after
they are pumped by green-blue light. Finally, the excited MR dyes are diffused and adsorbed
onto the un-treated ITO surface and LC molecules are aligned with their long axes
perpendicular to the polarization of the pump beam. If the cell is maintained at room
temperature, then the photoalignment effect occurs primarily on the substrate that faces the
incident pump beam. This approach is called the single-side photo-alignment approach.
However, if a DDLC cell is heated and maintained at a temperature just above the clear point
of the LCs, then MR dyes are adsorbed onto two substrates of the cell. This process is referred
to as double-side photoalignment [15].
In this work, photo-alignment was performed using a linearly polarized DPSS (diode-
pump solid state) laser (λ=532 nm), whose wavelength was close to the peak of the MR
absorption spectrum [16]. Figure 1 shows the experimental setup. The pump laser beam,
propagating along the z-axis, with an intensity of ~0.361 W/cm
, was expanded into a
collimated beam with a diameter of ~21 mm. It then passed through a linear mask with a line-
width of ~200 um, and was focused using a cylindrical lens onto the cell. The sample was
attached to a rotating motor, and thermally controlled at a temperature of ~65°C (which
exceeds the clear temperature of E7 of ~61°C) during pumping to ensure double-side
photoalignment. The angle, θ, made between the polarization of the pump beam and the x-
axis (Fig. 1) can be controlled using the rotator at a rotating speed ~140 rpm. The period of
illumination was ~60 minutes. As stated above, the LC molecules on the surfaces of the

double-side substrate are photo-aligned perpendicular to the polarization. Therefore, a DDLC
cell with a double-side axially symmetric structure was formed. Notably, a reliable double-
side photoalignment can be performed by rotating the sample at a speed of ~60 to 800 rpm
under illumination for 60 minutes.

Fig. 1. Sample fabrication setup.
3. Results and discussion
Figure 2 schematically depicts the conformation and optical images, obtained under a
polarized optical microscope (POM), of axially symmetric LC samples. Initially, the pumping
laser irradiates the sample with a polarization angle of θ = 90° (with polarization along the y-
axis, as presented in Fig. 1). The excited dyes undergo trans–cis isomerization, molecular
reorientation, diffusion and, finally, adsorption onto the ITO surfaces and the LC molecules
become aligned with their long axes perpendicular to the polarization of the pump light. The
dyes can be adsorbed by both of the substrates of the cell when the cell is optically excited at
a cell temperature that just exceeds the clear temperature of the LC [15]. Since the sample is
rotated, double-side photo-alignment causes the formation of a double-side axial symmetric
azimuthal LC cell, as presented in Fig. 2(a). The diameter of the pattern is ~20 mm. The
polarization direction of the pumping light was then changed from y-axis to x-axis (θ =0°) to
fabricate another axially symmetric radial LC structure, as presented in Fig. 2(b). Figures 2(d)
and 3(e) show images of the axially symmetric azimuthal and radial LC samples, respectively,
under crossed POM. To fabricate a hybrid azimuthal-radial cell, two substrates were
disassembled from both azimuthal and radial samples were combined to fabricate a new
azimuthal-radial cell, as presented in Fig. 2(c). The coincidence of the symmetrical centers of
the two substrates is important. This step was performed carefully under a POM. One
substrate was fixed on the object-stage of the POM, and another substrate was adjusted by the
micro-travel stage. After being coincided, two substrates were glued together and a hybrid
azimuthal-radial cell was formed. Injection with LC yielded an LC cell with an axially
symmetric twisted structure, because of the orthogonal alignment between the two substrates.
Figures 2(f) and 2(g) present images of the ASTNLC samples under crossed and parallel
POM, respectively. In contrast, Figs. 2(d) and 2(e), which present the dark regions, show that
the polarizer and analyzer are converted to the bright state under crossed POM in the
ASTNLC sample, as presented in Fig. 2(f). This change of state results from the 90°
polarization rotation effect (under Mauguin’s condition) for a lineally polarized beam through
the twisted nematic structure. When the sample was rotated under POM, a stationary image
was obtained because of the axially symmetric conformation, indicating directly that the
ASTNLC device is polarization-independent.

Fig. 2. Axially symmetric (a) azimuthal, (b) radial and (c) twisted nematic LC structures.
Images of axially symmetric (d) azimuthal, (e) radial and (f) and (g) twisted nematic LC
devices under a polarized optical microscope. P: polarizer, A: analyzer.
The transmittance of the device was plotted as a function of β angle (T-β) at various
positions to obtain a structural model of the axially-symmetric twisted nematic LC film. Here,
β is the angle between the polarization axis and the front LC director. The device was placed
between crossed polarizers and probed using an He-Ne laser, λ=634 nm. Figure 3
schematically depicts the measurement setup. Figure 4 plots the measured T-β curves.
Clearly, the transmittance has maxima at β=0° and β=90° under the cross-polarizer condition
because Mauguin’s condition is satisfied. The transmittance is lowest at β=45° because of the
bisector effect of the 90° twisted nematic structure. Figure 4 plots the simulation results
obtained using DIMOS software. The experimental results are highly consistent with
simulated results. The scattering loss and surface reflection in the experiment show that the
experimental curves are slightly lower than the simulated curves.

Fig. 3. Measuring transmittance of ASTNLC cell; (a) β angle in front view and (b) testing

Fig. 4. T-β curves of ASTNLC device
To confirm the conformation and tunability of an ASTNLC, the transmittance-voltage (T-
V) curve of the device was measured under cross-polarizer condition at different positions of
the ASTNLC (A, B, C, marked in Fig. 3(a)). Figures 5(a), 5(b), and 5(c) show the
experimental and simulated results, obtained using DIMOS software, at positions of A (β=0°),
B (β=45°) and C (β=90°), respectively. The T-V curves are the same as a standard TN device
under the same β angle. The variation between simulated and experimental results mainly
comes from the large spot size of probe beam compared to the ASTNLC conformation.

Fig. 5. The transmittance-voltage curves of an ASTNLC at positions of (a) A (β=0°), (b) B
(β=45°) and (c) C (β=90°) marked in Fig. 3(a).
Figure 6 presents the polarization converter effects based on ASTNLC devices in an
axially symmetric optical system. Initially, a homogeneous-radial LC film (polarization
converter) [17] was adopted to transform linearly polarized light into radially polarized light.
The radial polarization was analyzed using an analyzer with transmission along the y-axis;
Fig. 6(b) presents the corresponding image. The region in which the polarization is
perpendicular to the analyzer is in the dark state. When an ASTNLC was placed behind the
homogeneous-radial LC film, it converted radially polarized light to azimuthally polarized
light. Figure 6(c) presents the analyzed (using a y-axis analyzer) image. This image is the
opposite of the image of radial polarization (Fig. 6(b)) in transmission.

Fig. 6. (a) Setup for converting polarization of linearly polarized beam using axially symmetric
LC devices; (b) radially polarized light and (c) azimuthally polarized light analyzed using an
analyzer (y-axis) under POM.
Light in a particular axially symmetric polarized state, such as axially symmetric circular
polarized light, can also be produced using this method. A particular LC device can be
designed and fabricated by combining axially symmetric radial and vortex LC [17] alignment
substrates as presented in Fig. 7(a). Figure 8 presents the image of a radial-vortex alignment
sample with α=45°, nd=1.9820 m observed under a POM. The polarization of incident
light was modulated after passing through the radial-vortex alignment sample. Simulated
results, obtained using Matlab software are also presented in Figs. 8(c), 8(d) for comparison.
As seen, they agree quite well with each other. The converted polarization state is determined
by nd, the angle β and the angle α (n: birefringence, d: cell gap, α: twisted angle). For
suitable angles α and β, axially symmetric radial polarized light can be converted into axially
symmetric circularly polarized light by propagation through the designed axially symmetric
LC device. According to calculation performed in Matlab, axially symmetric circular
polarized light is obtained when axially symmetric radial polarized light passes through the
specific axially symmetric LC device with β=30°, α=30°, and nd=1.7891 m, as presented
in Fig. 7(b).Additionally, unlike that of devices fabricated from liquid crystal polymers [13],
the phase retardation of ASTNLC devices with fixed β and α can also be controlled

Fig. 7. (a) Specific axially symmetric LC device; the top substrate exhibits radial alignment
and the bottom substrate exhibits vortex alignment [17]. The angle between the entrance LC
direction and the exit LC direction is α; (b) axially symmetric circularly polarized light was
obtained by the conversion of a radially polarized light via a particular axially symmetric LC
device (β=30°, α=30°, and nd=1.7891 m)

Fig. 8. (a), (b) Images of radial-vortex alignment sample observed under a POM; (c), (d)
simulated results. The analyzer makes an angle of (a) 90°, (b) and (d) 45° with the polarizer.
4. Conclusion
In conclusion, the fabrication of an axially symmetric twisted nematic liquid crystal device
based on axially symmetrical photoalignment in a dye-doped liquid crystal film was
demonstrated. Its conformation was confirmed by measuring T-β curves, and the transmission
of light through it agrees well with the simulated transmission. Additionally, ASTNLC
devices in an axially symmetric optical system, based on the polarization converter effect,
were also demonstrated. Notably, given suitable device parameters, an electrically tunable
axially symmetric waveplate can be formed from radial, azimuthal and vortex LC films.
Therefore, various axially symmetric polarization converters can be fabricated. The device is
very convenient to use. It therefore has great potential in practical applications.
This work was supported by the Advanced Optoelectronic Technology Center, National
Cheng Kung University, under projects from the Ministry of Education and the National
Science Council of Taiwan, (Contract No. NSC 98-2112-M-006-001-MY3and NSC 96-2112-