WG1: Benchmarking of asset management methods

butterbeansarmManagement

Nov 18, 2013 (3 years and 10 months ago)

110 views

Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management
methods

Portland

22
nd



23
rd

October 2009

Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Group members

Munich

Kalgoorlie

Portland

Ramesh Sinhal (Chairman)

UK





Alfred
Wenninger
-
Vycudil

Austria



Gerhard Eberl

Austria



Dominique Rafanomezana


Madagascar



Ricardo Solorio Murillo

Mexico





Sophia
Tekie

Namibia







Bert de Wit

Netherlands





Chris Parkman

New Zealand





Donald Morrison

Scotland







Fernando Varela Soto

Spain





Richard Abell


UK







Stephen
Gaj

USA







Viktor
Bardoczky

Hungary



Rachid

Tabbouchy

Morocco

Jose Ortiz
-
Garcia

Colombia



Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods


Case Studies


Benchmark development


Benchmark confirmation


Reporting


Group Task

Identify best practice in asset management systems with key aspects
for road authorities at different stages of development to consider
when choosing a system.


Review costs associated with asset systems and recommend where
costs are focused.

Strategies

Main stages of the work

Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Case Studies

1.
Namibia


Draft prepared


2.
New Zealand


Draft prepared


3.
Netherlands


Draft prepared


4.
UK: Scotland


Draft prepared


5.
USA


Draft prepared


6.
UK: England


Draft in preparation


7.
Spain (PPP)


To be prepared


8.
Mexico


To be prepared


9.
Colombia ?

Munich 2008

Portland 2009

Case Study Review

1.
Scotland
-

Netherlands

2.
Namibia
-

England

3.
USA
-

England

4.
Netherlands
-

Scotland

5.
New Zealand
-

Namibia

6.
England


USA

7.
Mexico


Spain

8.
Spain


Mexico

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Overall synthesised report


WG Chairman

Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Benchmarking Framework For Asset
Management and Costs


Subject Areas



Aspects to be considered to
show level of achievement

Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Benchmarking Framework For Asset
Management and Costs

Subject Areas



Goals and Objectives


Organisational issues


People and Culture


Data and Information


Risk Management


Delivery and Resource Allocation


Planning


Systems and Processes


Costs


Benefits

Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Benchmarking Framework For Asset
Management and Costs

Aspects to be considered



Goals and Objectives






Short and long
-
term goals



Achievable objectives



Stewardship of assets



Meeting stakeholders requirements



Performance driven decisions



Measurable performance targets


Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Call for Papers


proposed text

Identification and benchmarking of best practice in
approaches to asset management for road authorities at
different stages of development.


Issues that may be considered include :


Organisation, people and culture


Coverage and integration of asset types


Efficient and effective use of data


Risk management


Planning, decision making and delivery


Costs and benefits


Achievements and challenges



Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Proposed work programme 2009
-

2010

1.
Update case studies for Scotland, Namibia, USA, Netherlands, New
Zealand and England


Christmas 2009


2.
Prepare case studies for Mexico and Spain (PPP)


Christmas 2009


3.
Contact Colombia about preparation of case study


9
th

Nov 2009


4.
Circulate draft benchmarking framework


9
th

Nov 2009


5.
Comments on draft benchmarking framework
-

1
st

Dec 2009


6.
Comments on case studies


31
st

January 2010


7.
Final case studies
-

28
th

February 2010


8.
Circulate updated benchmarking framework


28
th

February 2010


Munich 2008

Portland 2009

WG1:
Benchmarking of asset management methods

Work programme 2008
-

2011

Issue: WG1
-

Benchmarking of asset management methods

Description of the selected
strategies

Identify best practice in asset management systems with key aspects for road authorities at
different stages of development to consider when choosing a system.

Review costs associated with asset systems and recommend where costs are focused.

Working group leader

Ramesh Sinhal

Cooperation within PIARC

TC
-
D2

Cooperation with other organisations

Austroads

(Chris Parkman)

COST

Actions (To
be

identified

-

Alfred)

ERANET

roads

(To
be

identified

-

Alfred)

Outputs

Calendar

Technical reports

Case Studies (Current Position and Best Practice)

Overview and Benchmark (Requirements for Asset Management
approaches)

2009 Q4

2010 Q4

Articles

Summary of Case Studies (Current Position and Best Practice)

2011 Q1

PIARC international seminars

Presentations

of case
studies

To
be

confirmed

Sessions at XXIV World Road Congress

Benchmarking

of
asset

management
methods

2011 Q3

Other events

ICMP8 (Chile)

EPAM4 (Sweden)

?

TRB 2012

2011 Q4

2012 Q3

?

2012 Q1

?

Aspects more specifically relevant to developing countries and countries in transition

Case studies to identify current practices and potential areas for improvement.

Seminar in Madagascar?