Central limit theorems

for variances and correlation coe¢ cients

E.Omey and S.Van Gulck

HUB Stormstraat 2,1000 - Brussels,Belgium

{edward.omey,stefan.vangulck}@hubrussel.be

March 2008

Abstract

In many texbooks,the central limit theorem playes a prominent role.In

studying condence intervals for the mean for example,the use of the central

limit theoremis fully exploited.For large samples froman arbitrary distribution

with nite second moment,we can always construct condence intervals and test

hypothesis concerning .In the same textbooks,in the treatment of the variance

2

and the correlation coe¢ cient ,the analysis is usually restricted to samples

from normal distributions!

In this paper we give a general and simple central limit appraoch to these

parameters and show that it is convenient but not necessary to restrict attention

to normal samples.Among others we discuss central limit theorems for the

sample variance s

2

,the sample correlation coe¢ cient r and the ratio of sample

variances s

2

2

=s

2

1

for paired and for unpaired samples.

1

1 Introduction

Let X

1

;X

2

;:::;X

n

denote a sample from X s A(;

2

),where A is an arbitrary

distribution with = E(X) and

2

= V ar(X).The sample mean is given byX =

1n

n

X

i=1

X

i

.

It is well known that E( X) = and that V ar(X) =

2

=n.To calculate

probabilities concerning X is a more complicated problem.For small samples

there are not many distributions for which the distribution ofX is known.For

large samples we can use the central limit theorem.The central limit theorem

for X states that as n!1,we have

pnX

d

=)Z s N(0;1),

i.e.we have

P(

p nX

x)!P(Z x).

We use the notation X t N(;

2

=n).In many cases this approximation works

su¢ ciently well.

The sample variances are given by

S

2

=(X )

2

=

1n

n

X

i=1

(X

i

)

2

,

s

2

=

n n 1(X X)

2

=

nn 1

(X

2

X

2

).

It is well known that E(S

2

) = E(s

2

) =

2

.For the variance,we nd that

V ar(S

2

) =

1 n

V ar((X )

2

).

To calculate the variance of s

2

is,in general,much more complicated.For a

sample from the normal distribution N(;

2

) there are no problems.In this

case we have

nS

2

2

s

2

n

,

(n 1)s

2

2

s

2

n1

and for large n we have

S

2

t N(

2

;

2

4 n

),s

2

t N(

2

;

2

4n 1

).

In the case of a sample from another distribution,these approximations are

usually not valid.In section 2 of this paper,we provide a central limit theorem

for S

2

and for s

2

.

In section 3 we state and prove a multivariate central limit theorem and

then apply a tranfer theorem to obtain central limit theorems for the sample

coe¢ cient of variation CV,the sample correlation coe¢ cient r and the ratio of

sample variances.

2

2 Central Limit Theorem for S

2

and s

2

2.1 Central limit theorem for S

2

In view of the denition of S

2

,using the ordinary central limit theorem,we

immediately obtain the following result.

Theorem 1 If X

1

;X

2

;:::;X

n

is a sample from X where E(X

4

) < 1,then

P(

pn(S

2

2

) x)!P(U x)

where U s N(0;

2

U

) with

2

U

= V ar((X )

2

).

Proof.Apply the central limit theorem to Y

i

= (X

i

)

2

.Remark.Note that

2

U

is related to the kurtosis (X) of X.Recall that

the kurtosis is dened as:

(X) =

E((X )

4

)

4

3 =

V ar((X )

2

)

4

2.

We nd that

2

U

= ( (X) +2)

4

.

2.2 Central limit theorem for s

2

To prove a central limit theorem for s

2

,we rewrite s

2

as follows.We have

(n 1)s

2

=

n

X

i=1

(X

i

( X ))

2

=

n

X

i=1

(X

i

)

2

+n(X )

2

2(X )

n

X

i=1

(X

i

)

= nS

2

n( X )

2

It follows that

p n(s

2

2

) =

nn 1

pn(S

2

2

) +

pnn 1

2

nn 1

pn(X )

2

(1)

We prove the following result.

Theorem 2 If X

1

;X

2

;:::;X

n

is a sample from X where E(X

4

) < 1,then

P(

p n(s

2

2

) x)!P(U x)

where U s N(0;

2

U

) with

2

U

= V ar((X )

2

).

3

Proof.Consider (1) and write

pn(s

2

2

) = A+B,where

A

n

=

n n 1

pn(S

2

2

),

B

n

=

p nn 1

2

nn 1

pn(X )

2

.

Using Theorem 1,we have

P(A

n

x)!P(U x).

For the second term we have

B

n

=

p nn 1

2

nn 1

pn(X )(X ).

Using the central limit theorem we have

P(

p n(X )= x)!P(Z x)

and the law of law numbers givesX

P

!0.It follows that B

n

P

!0.The

result now follows.Remarks.

1) In the previous result we used the following property:if X

n

d

=) X and

Y

n

P

!0,then X

n

+Y

n

d

=)X.

2) In section 4.1 we provide another proof of this result.

3) We nd condence intervals for

2

in the usual way.We have

2

= s

2

z

=2

Upn

and using

2

U

= ( (X) +2)

4

we nd that

2

=

s

2 1 z

=2

p( (X) +2)=n

.

In applications,we replace (X) by the sample kurtosis b .

2.3 Special cases

1) If X s N(;

2

),we have E((X)

3

) = 0 and E((X)

4

) = 3

4

and then

it follows that

2

U

= 2

4

.We nd back the known result.

2) If X s BERN(p),then = p and,using q = 1 p,we have

E((X )

4

) = p

4

q +q

4

p = pq(1 3pq)

Now we nd that

2

U

= pq(1 4pq).Note that for p = 1=2 we have

2

U

= 0.

3) If X s UNIF(a;a),we have = 0,

2

= a

2

=3 and E(X

4

) = a

4

=5.We

nd that

p n(s

2

a

2

=3) =)U s N(0;a

4

=5).

4

3 Multivariate central limit theorem

3.1 The central limit theorem

We prove the following theorem.

Theorem 3 Let (X

1

;Y

1

);(X

2

;Y

2

);:::;(X

n

;Y

n

) denote a sample from a bivari-

ate distribution (X;Y ) s A(

1

;

2

;

2

1

;

2

2

;).LetX = n

1

P

n

i=1

X

i

andY =

n

1

P

n

i=1

Y

i

.Then we have

P(

p n(X

1

) x;

pn(Y

2

) y)!P(U x;V y)

where (U;V ) has a bivariate normal distribution (U;V ) s BN(0;0;

2

1

;

2

2

;).

Proof.For arbitrary a and b where (a;b) 6= (0;0),we consider aX+bY.Clearly

we have

E(aX +bY ) = a

1

+b

2

,

V ar(aX +bY ) = a

2

2

1

+b

2

2

2

+2ab

1

2

.

Using the ordinary central limit theorem,we obtain that

p n(aX +bY a

1

b

2

)

d

=)W

where

W s N(0;a

2

2

1

+b

2

2

2

+2ab

1

2

).

Clearly this limit can be identied as follows:we have

W

d

= aU +bV

where (U;V ) has a bivariate normal distribution (U;V ) s BN(0;0;

2

1

;

2

2

;).

The result now follows from the Cramer-Wold device.Remark.The Cramer-Wold device states that for random vectors (X

n

;Y

n

)

we have

(X

n

;Y

n

)

d

=)(U;V )

if and only if

8(a;b) 6= (0;0):aX

n

+bY

n

d

=)aU +bV.

This device is easy to prove by using generating functions or characteristic

functions.

For random vectors with 3 or more components,we have a similar result

with a similar proof.

5

Theorem 4 Let (X

1;j

;:::;X

k;j

),j = 1;2;:::;n,denote a sample from a multi-

variate distribution (X

1

;X

2

;:::;X

k

) s A with means E(X

i

) =

i

and variance-

covariance matrix

= (cov(X

i

;X

j

))

k

i;j=1

.For each i = 1;2;:::;k,letX

i

=

n

1

P

n

j=1

X

i;j

.Then we have

P(

p n(X

1

1

) x

1

;

pn(X

2

2

) x

2

;:::;

pn(X

k

k

) x

k

)

!P(U

1

x

1

;U

2

x

2

;:::;U

k

x

k

)

where (U

1

;U

2

;:::;U

k

) has a multivariate normal distribution with E(U

i

) = 0 and

Cov(U

i

;U

j

) =

i;j

.

The following corollary will we be useful.

Corollary 5 (5) Let (X

1

;Y

1

);(X

2

;Y

2

);:::;(X

n

;Y

n

) denote a sample from a bi-

variate distribution (X;Y ) s A(

1

;

2

;

2

1

;

2

2

;) and suppose that E(X

4

+Y

4

) <

1.Consider the vectors

!

A = ( X;Y;X

2

;Y

2

;XY ),

!

= (

1

;

2

;E(X

2

);E(Y

2

);E(XY )).

Then

P(

p n(

!

A

!

)

!

x )!P(

!

V

!

x ),

where

!

V has a multivariate normal distribution with means 0 and with variance-

covariance matrix

given by

0

B

B

B

B

@

2

1

Cov(X;Y ) Cov(X;X

2

) Cov(X;Y

2

) Cov(X;XY )

2

2

Cov(Y;X

2

) Cov(Y;Y

2

) Cov(Y;XY )

V ar(X

2

) Cov(X

2

;Y

2

) Cov(X

2

;XY )

V ar(Y

2

) Cov(Y

2

;XY )

V ar(XY )

1

C

C

C

C

A

(2)

3.2 Functions

Using the notations of Theorem 3,let us consider a new random variable

f( X;Y ),where the function f(x;y) is su¢ ciently smooth.Writing the rst

terms of a Taylor expansion,we have

f(x;y) = f(a;b) +

fx

(a;b)(x a) +

fy

(a;b)(y b) +

12

R

where the remainder term R is of the form

R = (x a;y b)

f

x;x

(;) f

x;y

(;)

f

x;y

(;) f

y;y

(;)

x a

y b

.

Here the f

a;b

denote the second partial derivatives of f,and (resp.) is

between x and a (resp.y and b).If these partial derivatives are bounded

around (a;b),for some constant c > 0 we have

jRj c((x a)

2

+(y b)

2

+j(x a)(y b)j).

6

Furthermore,if jx aj and jy bj ,we nd that

f(x;y) f(a;b)

fx

(a;b)(x a)

fy

(a;b)(y b)

3c

2

and hence also that

3c

2

+

f x

(a;b)(x a) +

fy

(a;b)(y b)

f(x;y) f(a;b)

3c

2

+

f x

(a;b)(x a) +

fy

(a;b)(y b)

Now replace (x;y) and (a;b) by ( X;Y ) and (

1

;

2

) and dene the following

quantities:

!

= (

1

;

2

) = (

fx

(

1

;

2

);

fy

(

1

;

2

)),

A

n

=

1

p n(X

1

) +

2

pn(Y

2

),

K

n

=

p n(f(X;Y ) f(

1

;

2

)).

Note that Theorem3 implies that P(A(n) x)!P(W x) = P(

1

U+

2

V

x).

If

X

1

and

Y

2

,the previous analysis shows that

3c

pn

2

+A

n

K

n

3c

pn

2

+A

n

Now consider P(K

n

x) and write P(K

n

x) = I +II,where

I = P(K

n

x;E),

II = P(K

n

x;E

c

),

where E is the event E =

X

1

and

Y

2

,and E

c

its com-

plement.

We have II P(E

c

) P(

X

1

> ) + P(

Y

2

> ).Using the

inequality of Chebyshev,we obtain that

II

2

1

+

2

2 n

2

.

If we choose such that n

2

!1,we obtain that II!0.

For I,we have

I P(3

p nc

2

+A(n) x;E) P(A(n) x +3

pnc

2

).

If we choose such that

p n

2

!0,we nd,after taking limits for n!1,

that I is bounded from above by P(W x).A good choice of is for example

= n

1=3

.On the other hand,we have

I P(3

p nc

2

+A(n) x;E)

= P(3

pnc

2

+A(n) x) P(3

pnc

2

+A(n) x;E

c

)

7

As before,we have P(3

pnc

2

+A(n) x)!P(W x).For the other term,

we have

P(3

p nc

2

+A(n) x;E

c

) P(E

c

)!0.

We obtain that as n!1,I is bounded frombelow by P(W x).We conclude

that

P(K

n

x)!P(W x).

Clearly we have E(W) = 0 and for the variance we nd that

2

W

= V ar(W) = (

1

;

2

)

1

2

=

!

!

T

.

where

=

V ar(X) Cov(X;Y ))

Cov(X;Y ) V ar(Y )

.

This approach can also be used for random vectors with 3 or more components.

The general result is the following.

Theorem 6 Using the notations of Theorem 4,if f is su¢ ciently smooth,we

have

P(

p n(f(

!

A) f(

!

)) x)!P(W x)

where W

d

=

P

k

i=1

i

U

i

s N(0;

2

W

) with

i

= (f=x

i

)(

!

) and

2

W

=

!

!

T

.

Remark.We can also consider vectors of functions.

If (f

1

(

!

x );f

2

(

!

x );:::;f

m

(

!

x )),is such a vector,it su¢ ces to consider linear

combinations of the form

h(

!

x ) = u

1

f

1

(

!

x ) +u

2

f

2

(

!

x ) +:::+u

m

f

m

(

!

x )

where (u

1

;u

2

;:::;u

m

) 6= (0;0;:::;0).Now Theorem 6 and the Cramer-Wold

device can be used.

4 Variance and coe¢ cient of variation

4.1 The sample variance s

2

Here is another proof of Theorem 2.Consider the vectors

!

A = (X;X

2

),

!

=

(;E(X

2

) and the function f(x;y) = y x

2

.In this case we nd f(

!

A) =

(n1)s

2

=n and f(

!

) =

2

.Using (

1

;

2

) = (2;1) it follows from Theorem

6 that

P(

p n(

n 1n

s

2

2

) x)!P(W x),

8

where W s N(0;

2

W

) with

2

W

= (2;1)

V ar(X) Cov(X;X

2

)

Cov(X;X

2

) V ar(X

2

)

2

1

= 4

2

V ar(X) 4Cov(X;X

2

) +V ar(X

2

)

= V ar(X

2

2X)

= V ar((X )

2

)

We can easily replace (n 1)s

2

=n by s

2

to nd back Theorem 2.

4.2 The sample coe¢ cient of variation

In probability theory and statistics,the coe¢ cient of variation (CV ) is a nor-

malized measure of dispersion of a probability distribution.It is dened as the

ratio of the standard deviation to the mean:CV = =.This is only dened

for non-zero mean ,and is most useful for variables that are always positive.

The sample coe¢ cient of variation is given by

SCV =

sX

.

If 6= 0,we have X

a:s:

! 6= 0 and SCV is well-dened a:s:.Now we consider

the vectors

!

A = ( X;X

2

),

!

= (;E(X

2

) and the function

f(x;y) =

py x

2x

.

It is easy to see that f(

!

) = CV and that

f(

!

A) =

r n 1n

SCV.

Straightforward calculations show that

(

1

;

2

) = (

E(X

2

)

2

;

12

).

Using Theorem 6,we nd that

P(

p n(

rn 1n

SCV CV ) x)!P(W x).

where W s N(0;

2

W

) with

2

W

=

!

V ar(X) Cov(X;X

2

)

Cov(X;X

2

) V ar(X

2

)

!

T

=

E

2

(X

2

)

4

E(X

2

)

3

2

Cov(X;X

2

) +

14

2

2

V ar(X

2

).

9

To simplify,note that

E((X )

3

) = Cov(X;X

2

) 2

2

,

V ar((X )

2

) = V ar(X

2

) +4

2

2

4Cov(X;X

2

)

Now we nd

2

W

=

E

2

(X

2

)

4

(

E(X

2

)

3

2

44

2

2

)(E((X )

3

) +2

2

)

+

1 4

2

2

(V ar((X )

2

) 4

2

2

)

=

(

2

+

2

)

2

4

1

3

E((X )

3

)

2

2

2

+

14

2

2

V ar((X )

2

) 1

=

4

4

1

3

E((X )

3

) +

14

2

2

V ar((X )

2

).

In terms of kurtosis (X) and skewness

1

(X) =

3

E((X)

3

),we nd that

2

W

=

4

4

3

3

1

(X) +

24

2

(X) +

22

2

.

Remarks.

1) In the case of a normal distribution,we nd that

2

W

=

4

4

+

22

2

= CV

4

+

12

CV

2

.

In other cases,we see that

2

W

is inuenced by (X) and

1

(X).

2) In the case of an exponential distribution with parameter ,we have

= = 1=,

1

= 2, = 6

and then CV =

2

W

= 1.

3) For the Poisson()-distribution,we have

=

2

= ,

1

=

1=2

, =

1

and then CV =

1=2

and

2

W

=

1 2

+

14

2

.

4.3 The case = 0

If = 0,then CV is not dened but we can always calculate

1 SCV

=Xs

.

10

If

2

< 1,the central limit theorem together with s

2

P

!

2

shows that we

have

pnSCV

=

pnXs

d

=)Z

where Z s N(0;1).Now note that for x > 0,we have

P(

p nSCV

> x) = P(

SCVpn

<

1x

),

P(

p nSCV

< x) = P(

SCVpn

>

1x

).

As a consequence,we have

SCV pn

d

=)U =

1Z

.

The reader can check that U has a (symmetric) density given by

f

U

(u) =

1 u

2

f

Z

(

1u

) =

1u

2

p

exp(

12u

2

).

From this it follows that E(U) = 0 and

2

U

= 1.

4.4 A t-statistic

In the place of SCV we can study T = 1=SCV = X=s.This is a quantity

related to the t-statistic t = ( X )=s.As in section 4.2,we obtain that

pn(T

)

d

=)W

where W s N(0;

2

U

) where

2

U

=

4

4

2

W

= 1

3

3

1

(X) +

24

2

(X) +

22

2

.

Note that for the t-statistic,we have the simpler result that

p nX s

d

=)Z s N(0;1).

4.5 The sample dispersion

Another related statistic is related to the dispersion D =

2

=.This measure is

well dened for 6= 0 and can D be used for example to compare distributions

with di¤erent means.The corresponding sample dispersion is given by

SD =

s

2X

.

11

To study SD,we consider

!

A = (X;X

2

),

!

= (;E(X

2

)) and the function

f(x;y) = (y x

2

)=x.Clearly we have

f(

!

A) =

n 1n

SD,

f(

!

) = D,

!

= (

2

2

2;

1

).

It readily follows that

p n(SDD)

d

=)W

where W s N(0;

2

W

) with

2

W

= V ar(

1

X +

2

X

2

)

=

2

(

2

2

( (X) +2) +

4

4

2

3

3

1

(X)).

In the case of a normal distribution,we nd that

2

W

=

2

2

2

(2 +

2

2

).

If = 0,we obtain rst that

p n

1SD

=

pnXs

2

d

=)

1

2

Z,

where Z s N(0;1),and then it follows as in section 4.3.that

1 pn

SD

d

=)

2

1Z

.

5 Sample covariance and correlation

5.1 The sample covariance

Consider the vector

!

A = ( X;Y;XY ),

!

= (

1

;

2

;E(XY )) and let f(x;y;z) =

z xy.In this case we nd

f(

!

A) =XY XY

f(

!

) = Cov(X;Y )

and

!

= (

1

;

2

;1)

It follows that

P(

p n(f(

!

A) Cov(X;Y )) x)!P(W x)

12

where W s N(0;

2

W

) and

2

W

=

!

0

@

V ar(X) Cov(X;Y ) Cov(X;XY )

Cov(X;Y ) V ar(Y ) Cov(Y;XY )

Cov(X;XY ) Cov(Y;XY ) V ar(XY )

1

A

!

t

Assuming rst for simplicity that

1

=

2

= 0,we nd

!

= (0;0;1) and

2

W

= V ar(XY ).In the general case we nd that

2

W

= V ar((X

1

)(Y

2

)).

Remark.If X and Y are independent,we have

2

W

= E((X

1

)

2

(Y

2

)

2

) =

2

1

2

2

.

5.2 The sample correlation coe¢ cient

For a sample (X

1

;Y

1

);(X

2

;Y

2

);:::;(X

n

;Y

n

) from (X;Y ) s A(

1

;

2

;

2

1

;

2

2

;),

the sample correlation coe¢ cient is dened as

r =

nn 1XY XYs

1

s

2

.(3)

For n!1,a rough estimate gives

r t

E(XY ) E(X)E(Y )

1

2

= ,

so that r is an approximation of .As in Corollary 5,we consider the vectors

!

A = ( X;Y;X

2

;Y

2

;XY ),

!

= (

1

;

2

;E(X

2

);E(Y

2

);E(XY ))

and the function

f(a;b;c;d;e) =

e abp(c a

2

)(d b

2

)

Now we nd f(

!

) = ,f(

!

A) = r,and the derivatives:

f a

=

bp(c a

2

)(d b

2

)

+

(e ab)a(c a

2

)

p(c a

2

)(d b

2

)

f b

=

ap(c a

2

)(d b

2

)

+

(e ab)b(d b

2

)

p(c a

2

)(d b

2

)

f c

=

12

(e ab)(c a

2

)

p(c a

2

)(d b

2

)

f d

=

12

(e ab)(d b

2

)

p(c a

2

)(d b

2

)

f e

=

1p(c a

2

)(d b

2

)

13

It follows that

P(

pn(r ) x)!P(W x).(4)

where W s N(0;

2

W

) and

2

W

=

!

!

t

with

given in (2).

In this case we have

1

=

E(Y )

1

2

+

E(X)

2

1

,

2

=

E(X)

1

2

+

E(Y )

2

2

,

3

=

1 2

2

1

,

4

=

12

2

2

,

5

=

1

1

2

.

In the special case where

1

=

2

= 0 and

1

=

2

= 1,we nd

!

=

(0;0;=2;=2;1) and then we have

(

!

)

1

=

2

Cov(X;X

2

)

2

Cov(X;Y

2

) +Cov(X;XY )

(

!

)

2

=

2

Cov(Y;X

2

)

2

Cov(Y;Y

2

) +Cov(Y;XY )

(

!

)

3

=

2

V ar(X

2

)

2

Cov(X

2

;Y

2

) +Cov(X

2

;XY )

(

!

)

4

=

2

Cov(X

2

;Y

2

)

2

V ar(Y

2

) +Cov(Y

2

;XY )

(

!

)

5

=

2

Cov(X

2

;XY )

2

Cov(Y

2

;XY ) +V ar(XY )

and then (recall that

1

=

2

= 0 and

1

=

2

= 1) we have:

2

W

=

!

!

t

=

2 4

V ar(X

2

) +

24

Cov(X

2

;Y

2

)

2

Cov(X

2

;XY )

+

2 4

Cov(X

2

;Y

2

) +

24

V ar(Y

2

)

2

Cov(Y

2

;XY )

2

Cov(X

2

;XY )

2

Cov(Y

2

;XY ) +V ar(XY )

=

2 4

V ar(X

2

) +2Cov(X

2

;Y

2

) +V ar(Y

2

)

(Cov(X

2

;XY ) +Cov(Y

2

;XY )) +V ar(XY )

=

24

(E(X

4

) 1 +2E(X

2

Y

2

) 2 +E(Y

4

) 1)

(E(X

3

Y ) +E(XY

3

) ) +E(X

2

Y

2

)

2

=

24

(E(X

4

) +2E(X

2

Y

2

) +E(Y

4

))

(E(X

3

Y ) +E(XY

3

)) +E(X

2

Y

2

)

In the general case,we nd that

2

W

=

24

(E(X

4

) +2E(X

2

Y

2

) +E(Y

4

)) (5)

(E(X

3

Y

) +E(X

Y

3

)) +E(X

2

Y

2

),

14

where

X

=

X E(X)

1

and Y

=

Y E(Y )

2

.

The nal result is that (4) holds with

2

W

given in (5).

Remarks.

1) We can rewrite

2

W

more compact as follows.Assuming standardized

variables,we have

2

W

=

2 4

V ar(X

2

) +2Cov(X

2

;Y

2

) +V ar(Y

2

)

(Cov(X

2

;XY ) +Cov(Y

2

;XY )) +V ar(XY )

=

24

V ar(X

2

+Y

2

) Cov(X

2

+Y

2

;XY ) +V ar(XY )

= V ar(

2

(X

2

+Y

2

) XY )

2) Note that the asymptotic variance

2

W

only depends on and fourth-order

central moments of the underlying distribution.

3) If = 0,we nd that

2

W

= E(X

2

Y

2

).

4) If X and Y are independent,we have = 0 and

2

W

= E(X

2

Y

2

) =

E(X

2

)E(Y

2

) = 1.

5) If Y = a +bX,b > 0 we nd = 1,Y

= X

and

2

W

= 0.

5.3 Application

To model dependence,one often uses a model of the following form.Starting

from arbitrary independent random variables A and B we construct the vector

(X;Y ) = (A;B + A).Given a sample (X

i

;Y

i

) we want to test e.g.the

hypothesis H

0

: = 0 versus H

a

: 6= 0.

It is clear that

V ar(X) =

2

X

=

2

A

V ar(Y ) =

2

Y

=

2

B

+

2

2

A

Cov(X;Y ) =

2

A

= (X;Y ) =

2

Aq

2

A

(

2

B

+

2

2

A

)

and we have = 0 if and only if = 0.Under H

0

we have

p nr

d

=)Z s N(0;1).

15

5.4 The bivariate normal case

For a standard bivariate normal distribution (X;Y ) s BN(0;0;1;1;),we show

how to calculate

2

W

,cf.(5).

First note that (U;V ) = (XY;Y ) also has a bivariate normal distribution

with

Cov(U;V ) = Cov(X;Y ) Cov(Y;Y ) = 0.

It follows that U and V are independent with V s N(0;1) and U s N(0;1

2

).

For general W s N(0;

2

),we have

W

(t) = exp

12

2

t

2

and then E(W) =

E(W

3

) = 0 and E(W

2

) =

2

,E(W

4

) = 3

4

.

Now observe that Y = V and X = U +V.We nd

E(Y

4

) = E(X

4

) = 3;

E(Y X

3

) = E(Y

3

X) = E(V

3

U +V

4

) = 3;

E(Y

2

X

2

) = E(V

2

(U

2

+2UV +

2

V

2

) = 1 +2

2

;

It follows that

2

W

=

2 4

(3 +2 +4

2

+3) (3 +3) +1 +2

2

=

4

2

2

+1 = (1

2

)

2

In general,for (X;Y ) s BN(

1

;

2

;

2

1

;

2

2

;),we also nd that

2

W

= (1

2

)

2

,

and then

r t N(;

(1

2

)

2n

)

5.5 The t and the Ftransformation

The approach of the previous section can now be used to construct condence

intervals for and to test hypothesis concerning .

5.5.1 Testing H

0

: = 0 versus H

a

: 6= 0

In the bivariate normal case it is often necessary to test H

0

: = 0 versus

H

a

: 6= 0.In the bivariate normal case,usually one uses the t-transformation:

t(x) =

xp1 x

2

.

Observe that we have

t

0

(x) =

1(1 x

2

)

p1 x

2

Under H

0

we have t() = 0 and t

0

() = 1 and then the ttransformation shows

that

p n t(r)

d

=)Z s N(0;1).

16

Remark.Note that

t(r) r =

r

3p1 r

2

(1 +

p1 r

2

)

.

Under H

0

it follows that

n

3=2

(t(r) r)

d

=)

1 2

Z

3

.

For large samples it is not very useful to use the t-transformation.

5.5.2 Testing H

0

: =

0

versus H

a

: 6=

0

To test H

0

: =

0

versus H

a

: 6=

0

,where

0

6= 0,in the bivariate normal

case,usually one uses the Fisher F-transformation:

F(x) =

1 2

ln(

1 +x1 x

).

In this case we have

F

0

(x) =

11 x

2

The Ftransformation leads to the popular result that

p n(F(r) F()) t F

0

()

pn(r )

so that

p n(F(r) F())

d

=)Z s N(0;1).

This approach can also be used in the case where

0

= 0.

5.6 Spearmans rank correlation

To see whether or not two ordinal variables are associated,one can use Spear-

mans rank correlation coe¢ cient r

S

.In this case we start from the sample of

ordinal variables (X

1

;Y

1

);(X

2

;Y

2

);:::;(X

n

;Y

n

) and we assign a rank going from

1 to n.The smallest Xvalue gets label 1,the next smallest Xvalue gets label

2,...,the largest of the Xvalues is labelled with rank n.In a similar way we

label the Y values.In the case of ties,we assign each variable the average of

the rankings,cf.the example below.

Starting from (X

1

;Y

1

);(X

2

;Y

2

);:::;(X

n

;Y

n

),we thus obtain a sequence of

ranks (R

1

;R

1

);(R

2

;R

2

);:::;(R

n

;R

n

).The rank correlation r

S

is given by the

ordinary correlation coe¢ cient between the two rankings.We use the notation

r

S

= r

S

(X;Y ) = r(R;R

).

As before,we calculate r

S

by using the general formula (3) as before.Formula

(3) can be rewritten as

r

S

=

P

R

i

R

i

nRR

q(

P

R

2

i

nR

2

)(

P

R

2

i

nR

2

)

.

17

Now note that (with or without ties):

X

R

i

=

X

R

i

= 1 +2 +::+n =

n(n +1)2

.

If there are no ties,we also have:

X

R

2

i

=

X

R

2

i

= 1 +2

2

+:::+n

2

=

n(n +1)(2n +1)6

,

X

R

2

i

n R

2

=

n(n +1)(2n +1)6

n

(n +1)

24

=

n(n

2

1)12

1 2

X

(R

i

R

i

)

2

=

n(n +1)(2n +1)6

X

R

i

R

i

.

In the case of no ties,after simplifying,we nd that:

r

S

= 1

6

P

n

i=1

(R

i

R

i

)

2n(n

2

1)

.(6)

For independent variables,we can use the result of section 5.2 to conclude that

p nr

S

d

=)Z s N(0;1).

Remark.In the case of ties between variables,we assign each variable

the average of the rankings.Formula (5) to calculate r

S

should be modied.

Consider the following example:

X Y R R

RR

(RR

)

2

3 10 1 1 0 0

6 15 2 2 0 0

9 30 3 4;5 1;5 2;25

12 35 4 6 2 4

15 25 5 3 2 4

18 30 6 4;5 1;5 2;25

21 50 7 8 1 1

24 45 8 7 1 1

In the case of no ties we had

P

R

2

i

=

P

R

2

i

= 204.In our example,we

have

P

R

2

i

= 204,

P

R

2

i

= 203;5.If there is 1 tie involving 2 observations,we

see that there is a di¤erence of 0;5.

In general,one can proceed as follows.Let

t

2

= the number of ties involving 2 observations;

t

3

= the number of ties involving 3 observations;

...

t

k

= the number of ties involving k observations.

18

Now we calculate the correction factor

T =

2

3

212

t

2

+

3

3

312

t

3

+:::+

k

3

k12

t

k

In the case of ties,we replace (6) by:

r

S

= 1

6(T +

P

n

i=1

(R

i

R

i

)

2

)n(n

2

1)

.

6 Comparing variances

Testing hypothesis concerning di¤erences between means is well known and can

be found in any textbook about statistics.Less is known about comparing

variances.In the case of unpaired samples from normal distributions,the dis-

tribution of the quotient of the sample variances s

2

1

=s

2

2

can be determined and

is related to an F-distribution.In general,the analysis of s

2

1

=s

2

2

is more compli-

cated.In this section we study s

2

1

=s

2

2

for large samples.We consider unpaired

samples as well as paired samples.

6.1 Unpaired samples

Suppose that we have unpaired samples X

1

;X

2

;:::;X

n

fromX s A(

1

;

2

1

) and

Y

1

;Y

2

;:::;Y

m

from Y s B(

2

;

2

2

).In order to test whether or not

2

2

=

2

1

one

can use a test based on s

2

1

and s

2

2

.We need the following lemma.

Lemma 7 Suppose that E(X

4

+Y

4

) < 1.As n!1 and m!1,we have

P(

p n(s

2

1

2

1

) x;

pm(s

2

2

2

2

) y)

P(

p n(s

2

1

2

1

) x)P(

pm(s

2

2

2

2

) y)!P(U

1

x)P(U

2

y),

where U

1

s N(0;V ar(X

1

)

2

) and U

2

s N(0;V ar((Y

2

)

2

).

Proof.This follows from independence and Theorem 2.Now consider K dened by

K =

2

2

2

1

s

2

1s

2

2

1.

Clearly we have

K =

2

2

(s

2

1

2

1

)

2

1

(s

2

2

2

2

)s

2

2

2

1

=

Qs

2

2

2

1

.

Now we write

p nQ =

2

2

pn(s

2

1

2

1

)

2

1

pm(s

2

2

2

2

)

pnpm

.

Using the notations of Lemma 7 we have the following result.

19

Theorem 8 Suppose that E(X

4

+Y

4

) < 1.If n!1 and m!1 in such a

way that n=m!

2

(0 < 1),then

pnK

d

=)V

d

=

1

2

1

U

1

1

2

2

U

2

,

and V s N(0;

2

V

) with

2

V

=

1

4

1

V ar((X

1

)

2

) +

2

1

4

2

V ar((Y

2

)

2

).(7)

Proof.We clearly have

p nQ

d

=)W,

where W

d

=

2

2

U

1

2

1

U

2

.Using s

2

i

P

!

2

i

(i = 1;2),it follows that

p nK

d

=)

1

2

1

1

2

W

d

=

1

2

1

U

1

1

2

2

U

2

and the result follows.Remarks.

1) If = 1,we can interchange the role of n and m.

2) From the practical point of view,we can use (7) to write

1n

2

V

t

1n

1

4

1

V ar((X

1

)

2

) +

1m

1

4

2

V ar((Y

2

)

2

).

3) Note that the asymptotic variance depends on the kurtosis of the under-

lying distributions.We nd that.

2

V

= (X) +2 +

2

( (Y ) +2),

and then

1 n

2

V

=

1n

( (X) +2) +

1m

( (Y ) +2)

4) In the special case of independent samples from normal distributions,we

have

p nK

d

=)V,where V s N(0;

2

V

) with

2

V

= V ar(X

2

) +

2

V ar(Y

2

),

where X

and Y

are the standardized X and Y.Using the expressions of

Section 5.3.we nd that

2

V

= 2(1 +

2

),and then

1n

2

V

t 2(

1n

+

1m

)

4) If

2

1

=

2

2

=

2

,we can study the pooled variance given by:

s

2

p

=

(n 1)s

2

1

+(m1)s

2

2n +m2

.

20

Now we nd that

pn(s

2

p

2

) = (

n 1n +m2

)

pn(s

2

1

2

) +

m1n +m2

pnpm

pm(s

2

2

2

)

It follows that

p n(s

2

p

2

)

d

=)W

d

=

2

2

+1

U

1

+

2

+1

U

2

In this case W s N(0;

2

W

),with

2

W

= (

2

2

+1

)

2

V ar((X

1

)

2

) +(

2

+1

)

2

V ar((Y

2

)

2

).

In the case of samples from normal distributions with

2

1

=

2

2

=

2

,we nd

that

2

W

= 2

4

(

2

2

+1

)

2

+2

4

(

2

+1

)

2

= 2

4

2 1 +

2

t 2

4

nn +m

.

6.2 Paired samples

Let (X

1

;Y

1

);(X

2

;Y

2

);:::;(X

n

;Y

n

) denote a sample from an arbitrary bivariate

distribution (X;Y ) s A(

1

;

2

;

2

1

;

2

2

;).We prove the following result.

Lemma 9 If E(X

4

+Y

4

) < 1,then

P(

p n(s

2

1

2

1

) x;

pn(s

2

2

2

2

) y)!P(U

1

x;U

2

y).

where (U

1

;U

2

) has a bivariate normal distribution with zero means and with

variance-covariance matrix

V ar((X

1

)

2

) Cov((X

1

)

2

;(Y

2

)

2

)

Cov((X

1

)

2

;(Y

2

)

2

) V ar((Y

2

)

2

)

.

Proof.Take arbitrary real numbers (u;v) 6= (0;0) and consider the vectors

!

A = (X;Y;X

2

;Y

2

),

!

= (

1

;

2

;E(X

2

);E(Y

2

)),

and the function f(a;b;c;d) = u(c a

2

) +v(d b

2

).Clearly we have

f(

!

A) = u( X

2

X

2

) +v(Y

2

Y

2

)

=

n 1 n

(us

2

1

+vs

2

2

)

21

and f(

!

) = u

2

1

+v

2

2

.It is easy to see that

!

= (2u

1

;2v

2

;u;v).The

transfer results of section 3.2 show that

P(

pn(f(

!

A) f(

!

)) x)!P(W x),

where W s N(0;

2

W

) with

2

W

=

!

!

t

and

=

0

B

B

@

2

1

Cov(X;Y ) Cov(X;X

2

) Cov(X;Y

2

)

2

2

Cov(Y;X

2

) Cov(Y;Y

2

)

V ar(X

2

) Cov(X

2

;Y

2

)

V ar(Y

2

)

1

C

C

A

.

Straighforward calculations show that

!

!

t

= V ar(u(X

1

)

2

+v(Y

2

)

2

).

It follows that

P(

p n(

n 1n

(us

2

1

+vs

2

2

) (u

2

1

+v

2

2

)) x)!P(W x),

where W

d

= uU

1

+vU

2

,and (U

1

;U

2

) has the desired bivariate normal distribu-

tion.It is clear that the correction factor (n1)=n is not important.The result

follows by using the Cramer-Wold-device.As in Theorem 8,we consider K and now we conclude that P(

pnK x)!

P(V x),where

V

d

=

1

2

1

U

1

1

2

2

U

2

.

We nd that V s N(0;

2

V

) with

2

V

=

V ar((X

1

)

2

4

2

+

V ar((Y

2

)

2

)

4

2

2

Cov((X

1

)

2

;(Y

2

)

2

)

2

1

2

2

Remarks

1) We can rewrite

2

V

more compact as follows.Using the notation X

=

(X

1

)=

1

and Y

= (Y

2

)=

2

we have

2

V

= V ar(X

2

) +V ar(Y

2

) 2Cov(X

2

;Y

2

)

= V ar(X

2

Y

2

)

= E((X

2

Y

2

)

2

)

2) If we start from a sample from a bivariate normal distribution,we nd

(cf Section 5.3) that

2

V

= E(X

4

) +E(Y

4

) 2E(X

2

Y

2

) = 4(1

2

).

In the case of = 0 we nd back the result of the unpaired case with = 1.

22

7 References

1.Bentkus,V.,Jing,B.Y.,Shao,Q.M.and Zhou,W.,2006,Limiting distri-

butions of the non-central t-statistic and their applications to the power

of t-tests under non-normality.Bernoulli 13:2,346-364

2.P.Billingsley (1968).Convergence of probability measures.Wiley,New

York.

3.W.Feller,(1971).An introduction to probability theory and its applica-

tions,Vol.2 (2nd edition).Wiley,New York.

4.G.Grimmet and D.Stirzaker (2002).Probability and Random Processes

(3rd edition).Oxford University Press,London.

5.Ladoucette,S.A.(2007).Analysis of Heavy-Tailed Risks.Ph.D.Thesis,

Catholic University of Leuven.

6.Omey,E.(2008).Domains of attraction of the random vector (X;X

2

)

and applications.To appear:Stochastics:An International Journal of

Probability and Stochastic Processes,Vol.80,N

2-3,211-227..Available

on http://arxiv.org/abs/0712.3440

7.S.Ross (1998).A rst course in probability (5th edition).Prentice-Hall,

New York.

8.O.Rykunova (1997).Some applications of asymptotic distribution of the

sample correlation coe¢ cient Proceedings of Tartu Conference on Compu-

tational Statistics and Statistics Education (Ed.E.M.Tiit),University of

Tartu,Estonia,140-147.

9.Sta¤ of Research and Education Association (1986).The Statistics Prob-

lem Solver.Research and Education Association,New York

23

## Σχόλια 0

Συνδεθείτε για να κοινοποιήσετε σχόλιο