FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
State of play in the short
-
term fixed income markets
Demystifying regulatory reform, interpreting implications and offering solutions
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Contents
Reform update
Market, issuer and portfolio implications
Client implications
1
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
2
Reform update
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Current industry climate
3
I believe additional steps should be taken to address the structural
features that make money market funds vulnerable to runs.
Mary Schapiro
Chairman, SEC
“
”
A debate is on in the money market fund industry concerning the need for
additional regulatory reforms.
It’s disappointing that the success of the 2010 amendments is
ignored in pursuit of changes that will compromise core features
of money market funds.
Paul Stevens
President, Investment Company Institute
“
”
Money market funds play a critical role in the U.S. economy.
David Hirschmann
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
”
“
Europe doesn’t have any (money market funds),
and they have a financial system.
Ben Bernanke
Chairman, Federal Reserve
”
“
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
How strong are money market funds today?
Still, the SEC is proposing additional regulations with varying impact on systemic risk.
4
Source: Investment Company Institute
Money market funds have shown great resiliency since significant reforms
were enacted in 2010.
Prime Money Market Funds accommodated large outflows during
U.S. debt ceiling and Eurozone debt crises
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
The current regulatory environment
5
Regulators, think
-
tanks and industry organizations are working on a wide
range of potential solutions.
Split retail from
institutional
Split credit from
government funds
Structural
change
Two
-
tier regulatory
system
Status quo
Mandatory redemptions
in kind
Redemption fee
Escrowed shares
Gating
provisions
Sponsor capital
Shareholder funded
Subordinated share class
Capital
ideas
Minimal risk of impact to short
-
term markets while addressing
systemic risk concerns?
Floating NAV
With revisions to current
2a
-
7 rules
Unresolved systemic risk
in the market?
Implications for the
short
-
term markets?
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Potential SEC money market fund reform
SEC writing proposal
—
expected April
–
May
Two commissioners oppose additional reforms
—
one undecided
–
Commissioner Aguilar on the fence
–
3 votes of 5 needed to pass proposal
–
Potentially get 90
–
120 days to comment
Industry and investors
—
“Rare Alignment”
6
Proposed
money market fund reforms
Capital
Redemption
fee/holdback
Floating
NAV
Require money
market funds to hold capital
against a loss in market value.
Require
funds to charge a transaction fee for redemptions.
Potentially 5% of a client’s redemption would be held for 30
days. The 5% would be used as a first loss buffer in the event
a money market fund breaks the buck.
Convert money market
funds to floating
NAV
structure.
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Capital buffers
7
This proposal requires funds to maintain dedicated capital for covering losses
in times of trouble.
SEC position:
A capital buffer, in combination with the holdback proposal, would mitigate the incentive
for investors to run since there would be capital to address potential losses.
Capital buffer
Redemption holdback
Resources to address
significant falls
in a fund’s value
+
=
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Redemption restrictions
8
This proposal requires funds to hold back a percentage of a shareholder’s
redemption proceeds for a set period of time.
SEC position:
Discourages a run on the fund as shareholders redeeming the full amount of their
investment would bear the first loss in the event that a fund broke the dollar.
Example:
(Assumes a 5% holdback)
Investor owns
shares worth
$100
and redeems entire
amount
Receives
$95
today
Receives
remaining
$5
in 30 days…
…UNLESS a crisis
happens, in which
case the first
losses would be
funded by the
fund’s capital buffer
and then by that
$5
holdback
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Floating the NAV
SEC position:
A floating NAV reflects a fund’s true market value, demonstrates that money market funds
are not free from risk and helps reduce large redemptions during periods of financial stress.
9
This proposal requires funds to stop using the amortized cost method of
valuation and let their share prices float.
A historic look at market NAV fluctuations, 2000
–
2010
Prime money market funds
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
10
Market, issuer and portfolio implications
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Market Implications
Restructuring of intermediation in the short
-
term fixed income markets
AUM shift to offshore MMFs, LGIPs, STIFs and short/ultra
-
short bond funds
–
Transfer of systemic risk from one market segment to another
Yield curve implications unclear
–
shift to Tsy/Govt sector would pressure curves lower
–
demand for shorter, liquid credit product would steepen the credit curve beyond 3 months
Dodd
-
Frank and Basel III
–
supply challenges
Shift to bank deposits. Wholesale deposits neither desirable, nor economical for banks and FDIC insurance
on non
-
interest bearing accounts may not extend past 2012
–
deposit fees?
–
funding shift to the Fed?
11
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Market Implications
12
Is bank deposit growth sustainable?
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research, Haver, Federal Reserve
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Market Implications
13
Banks unlikely to invest excess liquidity at current market levels
Source: BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Issuer Implications
14
MMFs are a vital source of short
-
term funding to a variety of issuers
Sources: Investment Company Institute, Federal Reserve Board, U.S. Treasury Department, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Federal Hous
ing
Finance Agency,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board, Municipal Market Advisors
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Issuer Implications
15
Systemic risk reduced as short
-
term funding markets have contracted
*Data for 2010 are through October.
Sources: Investment Company Institute and Federal Reserve Board
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Portfolio Implications
16
Floating NAV
Capital Buffer
Redemption Restrictions
Common Themes
Shorter WAM and WALs
–
first mover liquidity risks
NAV “arb” liquidity risks
Pricing considerations
–
premium on most liquid and easily
-
priced securities. Avoiding pricing “surprises”.
Increased levels of Tsy/Gov’t holdings in credit MMFs
Credit decisions become more conservative. Credit specific
stress => NAV and cash flow implications
Unique liquidity considerations: how to account for and
Manage the “hold back”. An additional liquidity requirement.
Sponsors with deeper capital resources attract a greater share
of industry AUM. Consolidation drives supply challenges.
Greater flexibility in regulatory framework if capital exists?
Consolidation impact on market liquidity. More concentrated
buyer bases.
Existing supply challenges exacerbated. Demand for shorter,
less volatile assets will not be met with issuer supply.
Shorter, more liquid and less credit
-
sensitive portfolios
More opportunity to add value in SMA structures?
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
17
Client implications
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Corporate reactions
18
We rely upon the convenience and simplicity that the stable NAV
provides for accounting, recordkeeping and tax treatment of cash
balances.
New Jersey Association of Counties
“
”
Investors and issuers of money market funds express concerns about the
potential reforms.
Money market mutual funds are a reliable source of direct,
short
-
term financing for millions of businesses, non
-
profits,
and others, including colleges and universities.
American Association of State Colleges and Universities
”
“
Holding back a portion of an investor’s money to guard
against changes in share value would drive investment away
from the funds.
The Pennsylvania League of Cities and Municipalities
”
“
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Capital Buffers
19
A capital reserve is an interesting idea, but there are limits on the amount of
capital that could be raised.
Key considerations
Implications
A buffer can absorb limited losses
It cannot guarantee that a fund will not
break the dollar
Key questions remain: how much capital
is needed, and who will fund it?
Near
-
zero interest rates make
accumulating capital challenging for
shareholders
Requiring funds to raise the capital would
raises costs and lower returns
Higher costs, lower returns
-
Requiring a capital buffer would almost certainly
lead to lower returns on money market funds
Limited protection
-
A capital buffer would limit the actual protection
to investors from a fund breaking the dollar but
WOULD give them a false sense of protection
Investment policy impact
-
The implementation of capital buffers may
require changes to your investment policy
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Redemption Restrictions
20
This proposal eliminates the very attribute investors value most in a money
market fund
–
daily liquidity.
Key considerations
Implications
Changes the very nature, utility and value
of money market funds
䵡M c慵a攠s桡牥桯h摥牳d瑯t慣瑵慬ly
牥摥敭r浯牥m煵qckly
Discourages the use of money market
funds in a wide range of transactions
䑩s牵灴猠瑨攠sw敥瀠c慰慢ali瑹漠浡湹
i湶敳瑯牳敬y 潮
剥R畬瑳 i渠浯牥n慲摵潵a散潲摫敥灩湧
䱯ss映摡ilyi煵i摩瑹
-
Investors
will no longer be able to redeem
their shares in full each day
More arduous recordkeeping
-
A holdback
position would eliminate the
current accounting simplicity of money
market funds
Investment
policy impact
-
With
many corporate investment policies
detailing liquidity requirements, investors
may be less willing or unable to invest
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Floating the NAV
21
Investment Policy Impact
This proposal eliminates the very attribute investors value most in a money
market fund
—
a constant NAV.
Key considerations
Implications
History shows that floating NAV funds
are not immune to redemption pressure
Many investors are unable or unwilling
to use floating NAV funds
Investors may turn to less
-
regulated
products
Investors may increase use of bank
deposits
This may lead to constriction of short
-
term credit
Accounting/tax implications
-
A floating NAV generates taxable gains and
losses with each subscription and redemption
Investment policy restrictions
-
Investors restricted from using floating NAV
products will have to find other cash
management solutions
Investment policy impact
-
Using a floating NAV money market fund may
require changes to your investment policy
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Appendix
–
Slide 14 Footnotes
22
FOR INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS ONLY. NOT FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION.
Important information
23
Any forecasts, figures, opinions or investment techniques and strategies set out, unless otherwise stated, are J.P. Morgan As
set
Management’s own at date of
publication. They are considered to be accurate at the time of writing, but no warranty of accuracy is given and no liability
in
respect of any error or omission is
accepted. They may be subject to change without reference or notification to you. The views contained herein are not to be ta
ken
as an advice or recommendation
to buy or sell any investment and the material should not be relied upon as containing sufficient information to support an i
nve
stment decision. It should be noted
that the value of investments and the income from them may fluctuate in accordance with market conditions and taxation agreem
ent
s and investors may not get
back the full amount invested. Both past performance and yield may not be a reliable guide to future performance. You should
als
o note that if you contact J.P.
Morgan Asset Management by telephone those lines could be recorded and may be monitored for security and training purposes. J
.P.
Morgan Asset Management
is the brand name for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co and its affiliates worldwide.
Issued by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) Société à responsabilité limitée, European Bank & Business Centre, 6 route de Tr
ève
s, L
-
2633 Senningerberg,
Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, R.C.S.Luxembourg B27900, corporate capital EUR 10.000.000.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the brand for the asset management business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. and its affiliates worldw
ide
. This communication is
issued by the following entities: in the United Kingdom by JPMorgan Asset Management (UK) Limited which is regulated by the F
ina
ncial Services Authority; in
other EU jurisdictions by JPMorgan Asset Management (Europe) S.à r.l., Issued in Switzerland by J.P. Morgan (Suisse) SA, whic
h i
s regulated by the Swiss
Financial Market Supervisory Authority FINMA; in Hong Kong by JF Asset Management Limited, or JPMorgan Funds (Asia) Limited,
or
JPMorgan Asset
Management Real Assets (Asia) Limited, all of which are regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission; in Singapore by J
PMo
rgan Asset Management
(Singapore) Limited which is regulated by the Monetary Authority of Singapore; in Japan by JPMorgan Securities Japan Limited
whi
ch is regulated by the Financial
Services Agency, in Australia by JPMorgan Asset Management (Australia) Limited which is regulated by the Australian Securitie
s a
nd Investments Commission and
in the United States by J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. which is regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
For
U.S. registered mutual
funds, J.P. Morgan Institutional Investments Inc.,
FINRA
/
SIPC
,
www.finra.org
. Accordingly this document should not be circulated or presented to persons other
than to professional, institutional or wholesale investors as defined in the relevant local regulations. The value of investm
ent
s and the income from them may fall as
well as rise and investors may not get back the full amount invested.
J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the marketing name for the asset management businesses of JPMorgan Chase & Co. Those business
es
include, but are not
limited to, J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc., Security Capital Research & Management Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Alter
nat
ive Asset Management, Inc.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Σχόλια 0
Συνδεθείτε για να κοινοποιήσετε σχόλιο