Viewpoints on Medical Ethics Revision
The viewpoints on the ethics of genetic engineering and euthanasia
are similar.
Genetic engineering :
An embryo is a
potential
life.
Should we be ‘playing God’ or ‘meddling with nature’ when we
allow embryos to be altered?
Are we allowing murder if embryos are being discarded because
they are defective or after using them for research?
Euthanasia:
Do we have the right to end a life prematurely or are we ‘playing
God’?
We are concerned with the viewpoints of:
Scientists
Christians
Hindus
Secularists
You
Genetic Engineering
The manipulation of the genetic material of an organism.
Medical Scientists Views
For:
•
An embryo is just a collection of cells with no feelings
•
‘Life’ doesn’t begin at conception so it’s not murder
•
It can help get rid of diseases such as Parkinson’s,
Alzheimer's and maybe even cancer.
Responses:
•
It could lead to human life being devalued
•
If life does begin at conception it could be murder
•
It could lead to a society of designer babies
•
Only the rich may be able to afford it
•
We could end up breeding clones for spare parts
Christian Views
For:
Christianity teaches compassion towards others; allowing a
childless couple to have a child is compassionate
Roman Catholic Church believes gene therapy is acceptable if it is
of medical benefit
Church of Scotland only approves medical research on embryos
up to 14 days of development
Jesus did not want people to suffer; finding new treatments and
cures helps prevent suffering
Against:
Some Christians believe life begins at conception so using
embryos for research is murder
In the Bible’s Book of Exodus, Moses received the
Commandments, one of which was ‘Do not kill’
The Book of Job from the Bible teaches that life is sacred and only
should be ended by God
Hindu Views
For:
The atman (soul) lives forever so it would continue to exist.
Showing compassion and helping others is a requirement of
dharma.
Against:
The atman enters the embryo at conception so
i
t is murder.
Brahman is in all things, so harming an embryo is harming
Brahman
Killing an embryo disrupts samsara which will lead to poor karma
Ahimsa means non
-
harm, an in important aspect of Hinduism, so
killing an embryo is not following dharma and could lead to poor
karma
Secularist views
-
Peter
Singer
–
Utilitarian
For:
Abortions are carried out to terminate cases such
as Down’s Syndrome; allowing genetic selection
would avoid the need for abortion
Utilitarians want what the majority of people want which is for
embryo research to continue
We shouldn’t be put off using genetic engineering because
someone
might
abuse it.
Concerns:
The government must ensure that it is not only the rich that
benefit
Secularist views
–
Richard
D
awkins
–
British Humanist Assoc. (BHA)
For:
It is the
quality
of life that matters, not the
sanctity
of life.
Genetic engineering is not bad in itself, it is how it is used.
Up until 14 days of development, an embryo is just a collection
of cells and cannot suffer.
If embryos can be used to stop pain and suffering then they
should.
Concerns:
Safeguards against misuse must be put in place by the government
Euthanasia
An good or easy death
Choosing to end your life with professional assistance
Christian Views
Against:
The Book of Job from the Bible teaches that life is sacred
and
only should be ended by
God
In the Bible’s Book of Exodus, Moses received the
Commandments
,
one of which was ‘Do not kill’
Pope John Paul II, Roman Catholic, said euthanasia was
‘breaking God’s laws’
Church of Scotland says life is ‘on loan’ from God and
we must look after it
The Father Ireneus theodicy tells that there can be a purpose to
suffering
Christian
Views
For:
In the Bible, Luke Ch. 10, says that we should love each other as
we love ourselves; allowing euthanasia is the ultimate act of love.
Jesus taught compassion; it is not compassionate to let someone
die in extreme pain so euthanasia should be allowed.
Jesus came to Earth to stop suffering; so should we if we can.
If someone is a PVS then the ‘person’ has already gone.
Hindu
Views
Against:
Suicide and assisting suicide is a sin
Brahman gives life and Brahman should take it away
Bad actions such as euthanasia leads to poor karma in rebirth
(Bhagavad Gita 14:16)
Euthanasia interferes with the cycle of samsara thus affecting
achievement of Moksha
For:
Ending someone's suffering is a good thing resulting in good karma
Brahman does not want needless suffering and his grace will
understand our actions
Secularist views
-
Peter Singer
–
Utilitarian
For:
People should have the freedom to choose how they die.
Life is about
quality
–
if there is none then death should be allowed.
People should be allowed to die with dignity
If someone is incapable of making a decision then relatives or medical staff
should do it for them
Not allowing euthanasia can mean someone’s pain be extended
Responses
to Secularist
views
-
Peter Singer
–
Utilitarian
There is always hope of a cure (and it has happened in the past)
There could be a miracle
Palliative care is getting better all the time
Pain relief treatments are always improving
Specialists can get diagnosis and prognosis wrong
Your Views
For or Against?
It is advisable to have your answer prepared
It is easier to answer both FOR & AGAINST
It is best to use the arguments you have learned on the
course
E.g. 2 well developed points FOR & 2 well developed
points against
–
you are showing you understand the
issues.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%
Σχόλια 0
Συνδεθείτε για να κοινοποιήσετε σχόλιο