The Arabs await the phone call

obsequiousravioliΛογισμικό & κατασκευή λογ/κού

29 Οκτ 2013 (πριν από 3 χρόνια και 8 μήνες)

69 εμφανίσεις

Print http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?item...
1 von 2 30.05.2005 08:25
w w w . h a a r e t z . c o m
Last update - 01:45 30/05/2005
The Arabs await the phone call
By Akiva Eldar
On May 26, 2005, 38 years less 10 days after the Six-Day War broke
out, in an open message to the prime minister of Israel, the elected
leader of the Palestinian nation proposed a peace agreement, full
recognition of the June 4, 1967 borders, and a mutually agreed
solution to the refugee problem. Along with that message, which was
published in The Wall Street Journal, the Palestinian foreign minister
proposed in the pages of Haaretz readiness to leave a number of
settlements in place for proper territorial compensation. And what
happened? Nothing. The Prime Minister's Bureau is silent, the Oslo
architects are busy with primaries, Peace Now is pasting stickers for
disengagement. And the negotiations for a permanent status
agreement can wait.
The disengagement seems to have dried up the memory. Like the road
map, the unilateral withdrawal from Gaza was custom-made to fit the
problematic shape of Yasser ("there is no partner") Arafat. The
permanent solution, based on two states along the 1967 borders, was
postponed for the sake of a provisional state, to fill the political
vacuum that claimed the lives of more than 3,000 Palestinians and
1,000 Israelis. We were told that the permanent agreement would wait
until the Palestinians choose a democratically elected, pragmatic
leader who would declare war on violence. In short, someone like
Abu Mazen. But the approach that says security now, peace later,
remains in force even after he was elected, and the formula of "land
for peace" has given way to the annexationist fence and an arbitrary
withdrawal in exchange for nothing.
In an important article that barely was noticed in Israel, Abu Mazen
announced the end of the era of interim arrangements and partial
agreements. He calls on Sharon to abandon the unilateral policy and
to immediately engage in direct negotiations "to put an end, once and
for all, to our tragic conflict." True, he did not announce that he was
giving up on the right of return - as some expect him to do even
before Israel agrees to even discuss the end of the conflict with him.
And didn't Sharon declare just a week ago that "united Jerusalem,"
including the sites holy to Islam and Christianity, is never going to be
subject to negotiation?
Abu Mazen rightly wrote that time is the greatest enemy of the peace.
Time is the great enemy of the Palestinians who want to be freed of
the occupation, and of the Israelis who want to get rid of its burden.
Print http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?item...
2 von 2 30.05.2005 08:25
Since 1967, as Moshe Dayan said, Israel has been awaiting a phone
call from the Arabs. When the phone call came, for example from the
late King Hussein, with a proposal to begin negotiations for peace in
exchange for a withdrawal from the West Bank and East Jerusalem,
we didn't like the sound of the ring. If not for the trauma of the Yom
Kippur War, the phone lines to Egypt would not doubt have remained
cut to this day.
The first intifada was needed to make Yitzhak Rabin lift the phone to
the PLO. The second intifada produced for the first time a
conciliatory ring from Saudi Arabia and then from the Arab League,
first at the Beirut summit and more recently at Algiers. Jerusalem did
not hear it. Now, the ruckus over the disengagement is deafening the
ears and the Golden Calf of unilateralism is hiding the clear political
horizon that Abu Mazen is presenting. Only at academic seminars are
there discussions of what will happen in the rest of the territories on
the day after the disengagement. Apparently, academia has ceased
believing the prime minister, who constantly reiterates that as long as
he remains in office, what existed in the West Bank for the last 38
years (exactly twice the number of years we lived without the
occupation) is what will be in the future. It should be remembered
that 38 years ago, Israel ruled over 670,000 Palestinians there. Now
there are 2.3 million who don't want our rule, including in East
Jerusalem.
When Abu Mazen argues that time is the enemy of peace, he
presumably is warning against the danger that in the absence of
political progress toward an end to the occupation, the national
conflict will turn into an armed religious conflict, with validation at
the polling booth. According to all the signs, Sharon is sticking to the
belief that time is on his side, and the person holding the line, George
W. Bush, apparently hasn't decided yet, who is right.
/hasen/objects/pages/PrintArticleEn.jhtml?itemNo=581833
close window