IRWG Meeting Notes December 21, 2011 Attendees: Lisa Schick, ScenPro Elaine Freund, 3 Mill Grace Stafford, JAX

noiseboliviaΑσφάλεια

5 Νοε 2013 (πριν από 3 χρόνια και 11 μήνες)

97 εμφανίσεις

IRWG
Meeting Notes

December 21, 2011


Attendees:

Lisa Schick
, ScenPro

Elaine Freund
, 3
rd

Mill

Grace Stafford
, JAX

Jason Hipp
, U of Michigan

Mukesh Sharma
, WUSTL

Jenny Kelley
, NCI

Bob Freimuth
, Mayo Clinic



Mukesh Sharma report out on HL7 CGWG activities.

Looked at all classes in Exp
erimen
t model. Still looking at document


Joint ownership of LS DAM

discussed:

There was p
ositive interaction with co
-
chairs

and
Joyce also in CDISC. BRIDG is shared with CDISC,

NCI,
HL7. She raised joint ownership of LS DAM. Shared ownership is of interest to CDISC as well.


Be
ck
y Kusch is CEO of CDISC

was there

and
is
on BRIDG BOD. LS DAM
would be
adopt
ed under the

governance umbrella of BRIDG. We have worked to harmonize. The
re is a natural extension to use
governance structure to support LS DAM.


Juli
is
invited to
present on the
board call

Scope and progress Q

are still a question.

There is an o
pportunity to pursue
further discussion
at HL7 in San Antonio


Consideration of
c
ontradiction or overlap b
e
tw
ee
n work with HL7 and working with semantic web
technology adopters
.
Note HL7 is more rigid


One of the co
-
chairs has concern on our modeling effort

and suggested a
joint modeling session with
CIC. They have templates on how to

develop a DAM. OMICS is okay with modeling, but not
documentation point of view. LS DAM has the documentation.

AI: how does BRIDG interact with CIC


Discussion of scope and clinical interest of HL7.

Q.
If we incorp
orate

too closely with Hl7 and CDISC

it is an extension to BRIDG and be maintained from
a clinical standpoint and lose LS perspective which was the original intent. Can we model

omics


and
specimen so it can be shared across contexts
?

A.
Start from LS to tran
slational (as opposed to vice versa)
, c
onsider carefully prioritization of areas to
model. Want a sustainab
ility roadmap for this activity and t
here may need to be compromises on scope
in favor of a sustainability strategy.


Q.
Products of this activity


how accessible will they be for the community? HL7 only, who owns the
artifacts and at what cost to obtain them?

A.
BRIDG not owned by anyone and could be an advantage


to protect it.

Want these artifacts open to public.


MOU that artifcats available


If this is under BRIDG umbrella, would BRIDG govern the LS DAM?

Scope, activities, priorities, extensions,

This was touched on and left that there could be various models to consider.

-
BRIDG governs

-
LS DAM as adjunct


Stakeholders likely to be different

than BRIDG



Has there been any work on BRIDG in terms of prioritizing gaps they have id, where they want to expand
and if it touches on areas of LS DAM.


Are you attending, are they discussing.

Juli will be attending.


Jan 11 planning