NETWORK TYPES; “COLLABORARCHY;” CONDUCTIVE ORGS; MANAGING PERCEPTIONS
Networks and Knowledge
what’s the diffe
explicit knowledge }
tacit knowledge }
why/how is KM “the driver” of most
What does all this
regarding managing networks; or
organizations in general??
regard in how we interpret “reality?”
…how we “solve” coordination “problems?”
Terms to understand
enactment (as opposed to economic
”rational” thinking vs. “social
New Public Management (NPM)
(or in essence, how to
does question “answer itself?”
they must add value or they’d
Cease to exist..??
add value from who’s perspective(s)?
vis Gormley and Balla, is this a
Does the “average citizen” benefit from public
Do networks enhance “the public good
…Compared to what?
(3) Networks and (changing???) boundaries of “the state” (
that is, the authority of
public agencies and jurisdic
take a hit
given the prominence of public
[examine Figures 9.1 and 9.2:
how do they relate to
Bureaucratic reasoning? G/B Ch. 2?
Bureaucracy’s bosses? G/B Ch. 3
Bureaucracy’s clients? G/B Ch. 4
The Conductive Organization
the same as losing
How does this question re
late to the “governance phenomenon?”
(what is it?)
How do network participants perceive the issue (of
How do YOU perceive the issue (of