summary of course strengths and issues - Intranet - Ravensbourne

jockeyropeInternet και Εφαρμογές Web

2 Φεβ 2013 (πριν από 4 χρόνια και 6 μήνες)

180 εμφανίσεις

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

1

SUMMARY OF COURSE STRENGTHS AND ISSUES


The following is compiled from the Annual Course Monitoring Reports 2008
-
2009 prepared
by Subject Leaders that will shortly be accessible on the College intranet. The reports
comprise commentary and data under twelve

headings, covering curriculum, assessment
and achievement, staffing matters, student feedback, quality and other areas, as well as
an overall summary. Strengths and issues are reported for each programme, alongside
references to the evidence sources for e
ach. The major sources are admissions and
results data, external examiner’s reports and qualitative data from student surveys and
staff.


BA (Hons) Animation


The policy of increased technical delivery throughout the last 3
-
4 years has manifested
itself in

BA students producing a high quality of work while successfully maintaining a
creative diversity of content. This year saw a smaller BA cohort graduate and there was
again a notable improvement in technical ability and content. It was also notably diverse

and complex in content. The completion of the group films again involved cross course
collaboration with broadcast and sound students. There still remained a feeling that there
were not sufficient computer resources despite encouraging the students to be
aware of
the open access policy of the College and to be aware of technical resources across the
College. Coupled with the failure of the render farm to be operational, despite this being
promised for the last 2 years, the students have felt particularly u
nder resourced and this
has sadly generated a resentful atmosphere amongst the students.



The use of blogs and journals for assessment purposes has been highlighted by our
External Examiner as a point of good practice, this is something that is being done

by
other institutions as commented upon in the Times Higher Education Supplement (02


08
October 2008 No. 1.865), we feel that this is an enhancement worth expanding. Similarly,
the planned adoption of Escape Studio’s VLE would be an innovative way to en
hance our
students’ abilities to learn independently; allowing them to view these learning resources
remotely will also hopefully allow students increased access to learning, helping to widen
participation. Unfortunately there was insufficient funding to d
eliver this training to all
students but the opportunities it offers at the present discount will be carefully monitored
this year in view of finding funding at a later date. We also intend to increase the amount of
inter level activities that we experimen
ted with last year, such as animation quizzes etc. to
foster a sense of inclusive collaboration on the course.


Strengths



䥮捲敡獥⁩ matu牥⁳ruden瑳



䥮瑲tdu捴楯n⁴o a⁤楶e牳r瑹fu瑰ut



䝯od⁢a污n捥 of⁧牯rp⁡nd⁩ d楶楤ia氠l牯橥c瑳



Tea捨楮i⁳ a晦⁡牥

en瑨u獩慳s楣⁡nd mo瑩ta瑥⁳瑵den瑳



S瑡晦 步⁩琠捬ea爠r楧h琠from 瑨e⁳ a牴⁷ha琠瑨ey⁥pe捴cd f牯m⁳ uden瑳t



Tea捨楮i⁡nd a獳s獳men琠p牯redure猻ste捨n楣慬⁤e汩ve特⁡nd⁡瑴a楮ien琻⁧牯rp⁷o牫



䍯C瑥n琠and deve汯lmen琠of⁴he⁣u牲楣畬im



䍯汬敧e⁖LE⁳ 獴s
m

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

2



Increase in first and upper second class awards

Issues



Decrease in black/minority ethnic students



Concerns over workload and learning time



Perception about balance between theory and practice



Selection process for individual film pitches



Balance o
f visionary ideas with technical innovation



Access to general and specialised IT resources


FdA Computer Visualisation and Animation


In 2008
-
09, FdA animation continued to increase its numbers with a healthy level 1 cohort
of 53. The course attracts lar
ge numbers of applicants which I feel this is partly due to our
S
killset accreditation and to the growing reputation of the course. The artistic standard of
the new students has also been noticeably improving and this will undoubtedly improve the
quality o
f the work produced, and again enhance the course reputation and profile.
Technical delivery has continued to produce a more capable, creative cohort and this can
be seen in how some of the students have successfully worked on live projects this year
(such

as with Tiger Aspect) and have had their work used on professional projects. Once
again animation collaborated with the broadcast students in preparing and presenting a
successful animation show at Rave on Air.


This year the level 2 students will again b
e required to participate in Rave On Air to
increase their exposure to industrial broadcast practice. Preparation and planning for this
event will take place significantly earlier in order to maximise their involvement. A new
member of the course’s session
al staff will provide specialist compositing tuition in Term 1.
Life drawing as a component of some of the level 2 units is a new addition designed to
ensure that the course is meeting Skillset’s requirements for accreditation. We will be
taking advantage
of the college’s render farm to develop students’ abilities to work on
more ambitious rendered film sequences. As well as life drawing, the students will also be
taken on site based drawing trips to broaden their contextual and visual diversity. Budgets
al
lowing, we intend to put in place access to Escape Studio’s online VLE for learning
Maya. Staff have evaluated this over the summer break and it looks like a useful way to
increase our students’ technical confidence.


Strengths



䥮捲敡獥⁩ 晥ma汥l獴uden瑳

楮iLeve氠l



䍬ea爠捯u牳攠獴su捴c牥r⁤e汩ve特⁡nd⁡獳s獳men琠dead汩nes



S瑡晦⁡牥renthu獩慳s楣iand mo瑩ta瑥⁳ uden瑳



Added⁶a汵l f牯m⁳e獳楯ia氠獴a晦



Tea捨楮iⁱua汩瑹㬠獴s晦 deve汯lment



Laptop bu牳慲r⁳捨eme



啳攠of on汩neou牮r汳lfo爠r獳s獳ment

Issue
s

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

3



Cohort size



Timetable complexity



Course switching



Increasing
experimental visual content



Funding for independent VLE licenses for students


FdSc Broadcast Media Technology


This was a positive year for the BMT course, with

some clear progress in te
rms of
applications, progression, and success
.
This was matched by continued progress in
revitalising delivery and in industry contact. The course team continued to employ
innovative technology
-
based teaching and learning techniques and tools to enhance th
e
quality of the student experience. The previous issues with lack of engagement with the
PPD unit were turned around, with students reporting that the unit was much more
relevant to their future in broadcast engineering. The External Examiner was supporti
ve of
the efforts made with the course, and of the directions for developments. Students made
very good progress with some making considerable industry inroads, and the majority
progressed with little difficulty on to the BSc top
-
up course.


Students engag
ed with Ofcom and, with Subject Leader’s guidance, obtained a RSL
(Restricted Service Licence) for DTT digital transmission of RoA 2009. Students also took
part in visits to industry and industry events. The course team was instrumental in
developing innov
ative system for paperless assessment. All submissions were on
-
line by
the end of the year. Discussions took place throughout the year with industry partners and
with students, as the new course structure based on 4 named pathways was designed and
validate
d. These new courses started in October 2009 when both the level 1 and level 2
students opted to change to the new course. The course team is enthusiastic about
developing the teaching resources for the new courses but concerned about developing so
much ne
w material for 4 courses across both level 1 and level 2 units. Nevertheless, the
course team are proactive in generating new course/unit development and delivery
opportunities.


Strengths



䥮牯rds⁩ ⁲ ach楮i⁳ hoo汳land⁣o汬eges



䝯od⁢a污n捥 be瑷een⁴he
o特⁡nd p牡捴楣i



P牯r汥m
-
獯汶楮i⁳歩汬⁤eve汯lment



䝵楤in捥⁡nd 晥edbac欠kn a捡dem楣iperforman捥



S瑡晦
-
獴uden琠牥污瑩tnsh楰iand⁩ vo汶ement映獴sden瑳tin⁣ u牳攠de捩獩on
-
ma歩湧



䡩ghly⁳ ppo牴rve⁩ du獴特楮歳



Employmen琠p牯獰e捴c⁡nd⁡汵mn椠ionta捴

Issues



乵Nbe爠rf 晥ma汥lapp汩捡n瑳t晡汬楮i



Adm楳獩on猠捯n瑩tue⁴o favou爠rh楴i⁥thn楣⁧牯rps



䍬a物瑹n⁡獳s獳sen琠dead汩ne猠snd eam楮a瑩tn date猠so⁥nab汥⁳瑵den瑳tto⁰lan

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

4



Suitable equipment available for teaching analogue and digital engineering pr
inciples in
the new building



Lack of specialist study opportunities



High teaching staff workloads


BSc (Hons) Broadcast Technology


This was a good year for the BSc course, with 12 students from the BMT Foundation
Degree course deciding to stay on for t
he top
-
up year. The cohort engaged well with the
course content, with three First Class Honours graduates representing 25% of the cohort
achieving this outstanding level of attainment.

The course team continued to employ
innovative technology
-
based teachin
g and learning techniques and tools to enhance the
quality of the student experience. The previous issues with lack of engagement with the
PPD unit were turned around, with students reporting that the unit was much more
relevant to their future in broadcas
t engineering.


The course team provided strong teaching and students were clearly engaged with their
learning and prospered. Increased use of the Moodle VLE and other innovative techniques
such as vodcasts were employed to aid teaching and learning and im
prove the quality of
the student experience. The continuing improvement of course management is reflected in
student feedback. Discussions took place throughout the year with industry partners and
with students as the new course structure based on 4 pathwa
ys was designed and
validated. These new courses will start in October 2010 when the College has relocated to
the Greenwich Peninsular. The course team were enthusiastic about the design of the new
courses and how they would relate to their associated FdSc

Broadcast Technology cluster
of 4 feeder courses. The course team are active in responding to course / unit review
opportunities.


Strengths



Growing the FdSc numbers through improved marketing of the newly validated cluster
would provide a chance for th
e BSc course numbers to grow



Enthusiastic and motivational teaching staff



Excellent use of multidisciplinary team work



Quality of teaching



High proportion achieving first class and 2.i honours



Continued evidence of high employability and excellent ca
reer prospects for graduates



Industry commitment to/involvement with course

Issues



White male dominated cohort



Lack of clarity in timetable



Support and advice relating to placements, PPD and career guidance



Equipment for teaching analogue and digital

engineering principles



Inconsistencies in the use of the Moodle VLE



Cross
-
college units

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

5



High teaching staff workloads


FdA Broadcast Operations and Production


A good year, with good final grades achieved by the 2
nd

year students. With the
introductio
n of ‘Celcat’ timetabling caused much confusion with students compared with
the previous year, but eventually was accepted, although the layout
proved


as is still
proving
-

to be difficult to understand


especially amongst students who suffer from
Dysle
xi
a.

Retention was again very good, with only a few ‘drop outs’ after the first term


mostly due to personal circumstances. There were no curriculum issues highlighted by the
student Reps. There was a slight increase in student numbers (8%) compared to th
e
previous year, but the course staff accommodated them without any major problems.
However, any increase in student numbers in future years could cause problems in regard
to room space and availability of equipment. As in previous years the course is stil
l popular
and over subscribed.


The course has developed and improved by introducing more projects that require
interdisciplinary working. Of particular note are documentary and drama productions
produced by the third year BA ‘Top up’ students and ‘crewed’

by the Location Elective
students, as well as all students ‘servicing’ the level 1 students from the Content Creation
course who produce a studio drama. Students continue to work on projects for external
companies and organisations. The Tag Ruby Trust too
k another group of students to
Uganda. The new project in the Camera Lighting and Sound unit, which was introduced
last year and reflected industry
-
working practice more closely, continued to be popular with
students and industry professionals alike. The e
xternal examiner also commented on this
practical exercise.


Strengths



Popula爬ver
-
獵b獣物bed⁣ u牳r



Wel氠lef楮id⁣ u牳攠aim猠snd⁣ontent

and⁧oodve牡汬⁢alan捥 of theo特⁡nd p牡捴楣i



Wor歰污le⁳業u污l楯nⰠwo牫⁥pe物en捥ppo牴rn楴楥i



Tu瑯物a氠獹s
瑥m and⁳ uden琠獵ppo牴



S瑡nda牤rof⁳ uden琠ach楥iement



E瑥牮r氠捯mme牣ra氠汩n歳

Issues



剥Ru捴楯n⁩ numbe牳rof female⁳ uden瑳



S瑵den琠numbe牳⁡nd demand猠sn⁥qu楰ment



䥮捲敡獩湧⁩ du獴特⁲ qu楲emen琠景爠
mu汴l
-
獫楬汥lpe牡ro牳



Keeping⁰a捥⁷楴i
ew⁴e捨n楣慬⁤eve汯lmen瑳



La捫映qua汩f楥i eng楮ee物ng⁴u瑯牳



䍯Cpe瑩瑩tn fo爠rmp汯ymen琠楮ithe⁩ndus瑲t


FdA Broadcast Post Production


The team has worked strenuously to make improvements across all aspects of the course
AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

6

and the External Examiners re
port, feedback from students, and statistics from registry
tend towards a positive endorsement of the team’s efforts. The course is proud of its links
with industry (post houses, Digital Vision, Quantel, Apple, Avid); and of the live projects we
were able
to garner as for students (e
.
g.

Tag rugby, Empire Design). The External
Examiner report was very positive in all areas around industry practice and assessment.
There were no changes to curriculum/structure over the last year


all indications point to a
co
urse running smoothly. The External Examiner confirmed “the scope of the programme
offered the students the opportunity to experience many aspects of postproduction ranging
from interactive design to applied postproduction. This inevitably means the studen
ts will
be able to gain a fuller picture of what postproduction is; therefore preparing them for the
industry”.


We continue to support a lively roster of visiting industry professionals as well as engaging
students in live projects. The team have develope
d online tutorials to assist student
learning and, with the launch of the new video server system we have uploaded a variety
of video clips and source materials for training use. Staff and students participate in the
VLE to enhance the learning experience.

The course team continue to keep abreast of
current developments in the postproduction sector. As in previous years, the course team
visited many Post companies during the student placement period (spring term) and was
able to talk to key personnel at th
e BBC, Absolute, The Facility, Frontier TV, Ascent Media,
ITV, Talkback Thames, Rainbow Post, Envy, Halo Post and many more.


Strengths



Increase in applications



Gender Balance improvement



High student satisfaction and retention rates



Teaching quality



mechanisms for student dialogue



Online tutorial development

Issues



Referencing and written work



Written work development strategy



Second marker feedback


FdA Creative Sound Design


Overall a strong year for FdA Creative Sound Design with a fantastic
set of results
(especially in its associated top
-
up, BA (Hons) Broadcasting (Sound Design), year
-
on
-
year
increase in student numbers, positive external examiner feedback and no noteworthy
appeals, complaints or issues.

The main concern with the course rema
ins the difficulty
marketing have had in drawing applicants to such a specialised subject areas. This has led
to the nearly revalidated course taking only reaching 65% of it’s target figure for 2009
-
10,
and steps are being taken to improve the public profi
le for the sound and music courses
that will run at the college in the coming academic year. These include the
launch of a
course specific web
site, site visits, improved open day presentations and a number of high
profile events and live projects.


AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

7

Effort
s are being made in order to create a greater online footprint for the college’s sound
and music courses


these include the development of course specific pages on the
college web
-
site, an iLike site, MySpace page and an associated course iPhone
applica
ti
on.
The course has built up and extended its relationship with the National Gallery


with students work now being featured on the Gallery web
-
site, as part of a film
showing/event and on permanent installation by the Gallery. The FdA Creative Sound
Design

is near to being a ‘paperless’ course, the majority of assessment submissions and
feedback are electronic. Certain forms of delivery have not leant themselves to e
-
learning,
and the course remains strongly rooed in the ideal of blended delivery. Certain

projects,
such as requiring students to keep blogs in place of project logs, have been abandoned
through the experience of students not seeing their relevance to the course (and a lack of
familiarity with the form itself).


Strengths



Increase in admissio
ns



High retention and progression to BA Broadcasting



Positive student feedback on course overall



High graduate employment



High quality of sessional staff with excellent industry experience and contacts



Online presence, paperless and use of e
-
learning
resources

Issues



Gender imbalance



Scope for students to focus on specialism



Recession employment concerns



Stores and facilities maintenance



Planning opportunities for collaboration with other broadcasting students on live
projects


BA (Hons) Broadca
sting (Sound Design, Post Production, Production)


The course seems to be achieving its aims, with positive feedback to course team from
industry contacts who engage with the course and/or its students. In terms of outcomes,
students are clearly stretched
beyond the basic requirements of the course and are
reaching high standards, as evidenced by their results. Structurally the course offers a
simple and logical progression designed to further develop analytical and intellectual
processes and the applicatio
n of practical skills and project management. As such it is an
improvement on the previous validation and will be improved by the new Top validated in
2009. The integration of shared units such as the Business Unit, and the Dissertation Unit
has been reas
onably successful, though PPD remains a significant problem in terms of
student engagement.


The course team provided strong teaching and students were clearly engaged with their
learning and prospered. Innovative techniques using technology were employed

to aid
teaching and learning and ensure the quality of the student experience. Quality
enhancement is embedded within the DNA of the course


staff are highly motivated to
improve on deliver and content year on year (and delivery of unit on unit). The pro
cess of
AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

8

quality will be greatly enhanced by the addition of another senior member of teaching staff.
Feedback from students in the internal survey has improved by
10% on average year on
year, with the course scoring highly across a range of areas, although

the score the on
college resources was low.
Attainment has remained consistent but there has been an
increase in 1
st

class awards away from Upper 2
nd
. There is a consistently good
progression rate between the Fd feeder courses and the BA top
-
up.


Strength
s



Demographic spread by gender, ethnicity and background



High standard of production skills taught and achieved



Student satisfaction rates



Course structure effective in encouraging creative practice.



Ethos of ideas and innovation embedded in programme

making, channel development
and business units.



Highest HESA employability score in the college both in terms of relevant employment
and overall employment.

Issues



Improve clarity in project briefs and assessment feedback



Written work development stra
tegy



Timetable complexity



Reduction in sessional staff budgets



Relocation challenge of maintaining facilities and resources and impact on student
satisfaction



Staff workloads


BA (Hons) Content Creation and Broadcast


The course espouses the College’
s strategic aims putting a emphasis on ideas, creative
content solutions espousing innovation that is multiplatform (or platform agnostic). The
course is strengthened with core production and transferable skills alongside embedded
business and enterprise.
Graduates leave multi
-
skilled and adaptable to a range of content
research, development and production roles across programme
-
making, journalism,
advertising, marketing and business. The revalidation enabled the course team to consult
students with surveys

and focus groups and this led to the development of the new course
within the college framework.


The curriculum teaches a combination of higher
-
level skills (group work, self
-
initiated
working, enterprise and business skills etc) and vocational work (tra
ining, production skills,
production work). The balance between the two may have an effect on first employment
opportunities.
The course has developed iteratively and is commented on by past External
Examiners of key areas of good practice in the field of

teaching media production. The
course continually develops and is enhanced it is very much a media course for ideas and
entrepreneurs. Students from Level 2 participated alongside students on the Xing project
this year, and students are encouraged to enga
ge in all aspects of the college with the
support of the course team. Students have run the Student Union for four out of the last
AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

9

five years, they form a high proportion of the ROA management and many manage
industry jobs (or even “survival jobs”) alongsi
de study.


Strengths



Good demographic balance in admissions and increase in applicants



Strong enterprise and business focus with high level skills for media



Teaching quality



Popular, coherent and well
-
paced fast
-
track course



Excellent professional/tec
hnical resources



RoA leadership


especially in commissioning, writing, promotions, exhibition and trade
fair.

Issues



Mature and international admissions reduced



Poor integration and unpopularity of centralised units



Project brief and assessment feedb
ack development



Employability challenge



Staff workloads



Professional/technical and academic facilities and resource challenges associated with
relocation


BA (Hons) Graphic Design


This was the first year that the Subject Leader took responsibility for

both Graphic Desig
n
and Design for Moving Image.
The take
-
over went smoothly and a lot of work was done in
looking at ways of devising better working practices between the two courses, better
relationships and more collaboration between staff and stud
ents
.
The process for the
future got started with simple collaborations such as all staff contributing to validating both
courses, aligning some units that were validated to allow for some collaboration, joint
participation in degree show issues and joint gues
t

lectures throughout the year.
The
building blocks have been put into place to improve further working relationships for both
staff and students. A new fractional member of staff started teaching at the beginning of
the academic year as well as a new, ful
l time member of staff, who then resigned at the
end of year, due

to relocation to New Zealand.
This resulted in another FT member being
employed at the very end of the year in time for t
he new academic year 2009/10.
The
entire sessional staffing was analy
sed and revitalised in t
ime for the start of each term.

This greatly enhanced the student experience and the morale of the students after
experiencing the changes in management of the course.


5 students achieved entry into the International Society of T
ypographic Designers, a
professional organisation that upholds the standards withi
n the Graphic Design Industry.
A
2
nd

year student went to Japan, having won a competition devised by Suzuki cars.


Strengths



High level of applications maintained

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

10



Student s
atisfaction with teaching and the curriculum



Added value’ through workshops and guest speakers



More collaboration with Design for Moving Image



Work across courses and faculty enhances student experience and simulates
employment



Links with Industry and
networking

Issues



Increased admissions



Relocation challenge to course identity



Progression from Level 0



Perception about lack of ‘specialist resources’



Staffing stability


BA (Hons) Design for Moving Image


This was the first year that the CL took o
ver the running of both Graphic Design and
Design for Moving Image. The take
-
over went smoothly and a lot of work was done in
looking at ways of devising better working practices between the two courses, better
relationships and more collaborati
on between
staff and students.
The process for the
future got started with simple collaborations such as all staff contributing to validating both
courses, aligning some units that were validated to allow for some collaboration, joint
participation in degree show iss
ues and joint guest lectures throughout the year. The
building blocks have been put into place to improve further working relationships for both
staff and students.


The students won both of the Promax UK student awards yet again this year, resulting in
ca
sh prizes and work placements. One student won the Panasonic Next Generation
advertising competition, which should raise the profile of the College nationally through the
Guardian newspaper. Another student received ‘best of show’ at the D&AD. A level 2
s
tudent did all the on
-
screen graphics for the Cumulus conference hosted by the college
this year at the 02 and the work of a level 3 student (Gorilla advert) was used by the
college at various marketing events.

This was the first year for a new member of t
he
External Examining team, as the academic representative. It was good to see that both
examiners compiled an excellent report for the course. There were no issues to be
resolved at all. The core team continue to work well together and this year with the
Graphic Design team. Good working relationships with Graphic Design have improved the
student experience, especially in the studio area they share. The external examiners
remarked yet again on the quality of the teaching. A Senior Lecturer was employed for

an
extra day per week to work on validation and with aiding the administration of the courses.


Strengths



A汬
-
牯rnd⁳ 捣e獳⁩s de汩very⁡ndu瑣tme猠sn楮 ⁷楴i⁣ u牳r⁳ ec楦楣慴ion



䥮捲敡獥d⁩ pu琠from⁣ou牳攠獴a晦⁴o⁐P䐠Dn楴⁴o⁥nhan捥⁲ 汥lan捥 and

app汩捡b楬楴i



Enhan捥men琠th牯rgh 汩ve⁰牯橥捴猠and⁣ mpe瑩瑩tns



E捥汬en琠e瑥牮r氠lam楮i爠repo牴r
楮獴楬猠sonf楤ence⁩ ⁴he⁣ou牳攠w楴i⁢o瑨⁳ uden瑳t
AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

11

and potential employers.



More collaboration with Graphic Design



Combination of creativity and techn
ological expertise



Close alignment and excellent reputation with industry


Issues



Impact of loss of Foundation Art & Design applicants



Centralisation of software training



Technical difficulties for students with VLE



Negative student feedback on ICT a
nd resources



Concentration of demands on resources through increase in shared units


BA (Hons) Interior Design Environment Architectures


This has been another outstanding year for student achievement of the IDEA’s course with
many awards and public acti
vities involving students at all levels. Student employment
rates in design have been affected by the current recession, and progression to
postgraduate courses has increased this year. The student survey data also suggests a
high satisfaction rating for t
he course and its quality of delivery. Applications to the course
increased, and we will increase the size of the level I cohort for a second year. We also
have a number of transfers from courses at other HE institutions into level II.


The course has been

successfully been re validated with City university, with course aims
structure and curriculum benchmarked against art and design, and architecture, in
pr
eparation for accreditation by professional bodies
, ARB and RIBA. There were no
significant changes i
n the course or the curriculum at level II, nor were there any
modifications. We received a very robust and supportive external examiner report with
some key points to monitor for the future as we prepare to move to a new building. On
standards: ‘standards

of achievement on this course are consistently good and at times
excellent’; performance: ‘at the top end of achievement students are outstripping
expectations’.


Strengths



Industry recognition and ARB prescription developments



Postgraduate developments



Student engagement, student services, VLE



Work placements and added value through industry
-
led activities



New course pathways:
interactive spaces, micro environment, virtual environment,
design culture



Student achievements, including ARB Part 1.

Issu
es



New admissions deadline

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

12



Maintaining professional compliance and currency of course



Managing Student expectations in the context of resources constraints



Support services for widening participation agenda



Staff retention, workload and development



Develop and exploit industry links



BA (Hons) Design for Interaction


This has been a challenging year for BA
(
Hons
)

Design for Interaction due to ongoing and
some unforeseen changes that happened throughout the course of the year. The course
has been g
oing through various transitions during that last few years (changes in Course
Leadership, staffing restructures, curriculum and resource changes etc.), although it
should be noted that the quality of student output has remained high across all levels of
t
he course (four 1
st

class honours degrees awarded in 2009). The biggest challenge of the
academic year was to re
-
write the Design for Interaction course and align it more closely
with Product Design. A large amount of research was conducted to establish in
dustry
opinion and expectations of graduates in this discipline. The Subject Leader visited
businesses (both UK and USA), to get their views of how and what design students should
be learning to make them more employable in the Interaction field. Opinions
from
companies like Adaptive Path and IDEO (San Francisco) and DIY Kyoto, Random
International, Flow Interactive, Phillips all contributed to the direction that a new Interaction
should take.

During the summer term 2009, Samsung Design Europe visited Raven
sbourne to set up a
professional/academic relationship which would result in graduate internships being
sought for the summer period of 2009. Three Interaction students were successful in
winning 4 out of 5 these internships. Cross
-
faculty collaborative pr
ojects involved working
with BA
(
Hons
) IDEAs

and BA
(
Hons
)

Product Design within the Urban Environments
u
nit
(Level 2) Student Study Trip was successfully undertaken to Madrid as part of the Urban
Environments unit in Autumn 2009. Although this course has
gone through difficult and
challenging transitions, the Design for Interaction course has continued to strengthen and
develop and has finally reached a stage where alignment and structures are now in place
to allow it to grow successfully. Graduating stude
nts also exhibited as part of the nationally
recognised New Designers showcase in July 2009 and got good responses to their work.


Strengths



Curriculum development and new technologies introduced



Staff restructuring and teaching quality



Achievements at
first and upper second award levels



Tutorial system



Employability developments



Merging of Product and Interaction will allow cross
-
disciplinary teaching and further
curriculum development

Issues

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

13



Admissions level and retention



Maintaining staffing and

resources



Pathway Leader vacancy



Student perceptions in the context of change



Maintaining external contacts through staffing change



Technical/technology teaching capacity



BA (Hons) Product Design


This has been a challenging year for BA
(
Hons
)

Prod
uct Design due to radical changes to
the workshop that happened throughout the course of the summer (2008). The College
has chosen to embrace a digital approach to 3D prototyping and has focussed on creating
a new cutting edge lab that will house various d
igital machinery including rapid
-
prototyping, laser cutters, zund plotters, 3D scanners and digital textile printers. The
transition to this new workshop philosophy has been reasonably successful, with most
Level 1 and 2 students embracing the set
-
up with
enthusiasm. Although the Level 3
students found the transitions difficult, outsourcing budgets were put in place to allow
student projects to be prototyped externally. This was only allowed in cases where
students could prove that prototyping of the produc
ts could not be carried out internally.
The introduction of this scheme proved very successful and only a small percentage of
students needed to outsource work.


The biggest challenge of the year was to re
-
write the Product Design course and align it
more

closely with Design for Interaction. A large amount of research was conducted to
establish industry opinion and expectations of graduates in the Product discipline. The
Subject Leader visited businesses (both UK and USA), to get their views of how and wha
t
design students should be learning to make them more employable in this field. Opinions
from companies like Adaptive Path and IDEO (San Francisco) and DIY Kyoto, Random
International, Curventa, Phillips all contributed to the direction that a new Product

Design
course should take. The course renewed links with industry for student placements and
employment. Several new live collaborative industry projects were run this year with great
success.


Strengths



䥮捲敡獥d⁡dm楳獩on猠and⁧ood⁥瑨n楣im楸



乥N⁡nd

楮iova瑩te⁰牯橥捴猠w楴i⁵獥r
-
捥n瑲ed⁡pp牯rche猠and楶e⁵獥爠r牯rps



Pa獴s牡氠ra牥Ⱐgu楤ance⁡nd 晥edba捫con a捡dem楣iperforman捥 and⁡pp牥捩r瑩tn映
瑥a捨ingⁱua汩瑹



S瑡nda牤猠of a捨楥iemen琬⁷楴i⁩ 捲敡se⁩ 1
st

class awards.



乥N⁤楧楴i氠l牯瑯瑹p楮i

污l



Me牧楮if⁐牯ru捴cand⁉nte牡捴楯n⁷楬氠l汬ow 捲潳c
-
d楳捩p汩na特⁴ea捨楮i⁡nd 晵牴re爠
捵牲楣畬im⁤eve汯lment

Issues



䝥nde爠rmba污lce㬠楮te牮r瑩tna氠牥捲畩lment

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

14



Facilities and accommodation constraints



Poor communication of changes in equipment an
d resourcing; negative student
feedback



Increase in 3
rd

class awards and fails



Staff changes



Risk of diluting Product skills development




BA (Hons) Fashion


This has been an extremely challenging year both for students and staff; in operational
and a
cademic terms. An Acting subject leader was appointed in January 2009 to
implement new timetables and learning and teaching practices. With very careful and
creative timetabling budgets were rebalanced ensuring curriculum provision was not
affected. Studen
ts and staff were pleased structure and stability was brought back to the
department when this post became permanent in June. In line with the college’s mission
statement and in preparation for the move to Greenwich, the screen printing facility has
been c
onsiderably downscaled; this change has not been welcomed by all staff and
students, requiring careful planning and research for outsourcing facilities, which will be
piloted in 2009/2010.


With the new Subject Leader there is wider vision for cross
-
pathwa
y and cross
-
discipline
collaboration, for example Product Design and Fashion are liaising in co
-
writing a joint
Level 1 for an Accessories/Luxury goods BA. It is envisaged that with the move to the new
building and all resources being shared this form of p
rogramme will become more
prevalent. Fashion will be planning Work Based Learning course development for the new
building. This will extend to more flexible timetabling coupled with more flexible utilisation
of resources. Fashion is forging stronger ties w
ith the FE programme and the
Communication Media Faculty. Strong links have been forged during the academic year
with the Level 0 and foundation course feeder courses; as well as other colleges in the UK
e.g. Leeds College of Art, West London College. Lond
on College of Fashion to name a
few.


Strengths



䥭p牯r楮i⁥瑨n楣im楸⁡nd matu牥⁳ruden琠adm楳獩ons



䡩gh⁳ anda牤rf a捨ievement



Ea牬楥爠獰e捩慬楳慴楯n⁡nd⁳ a晦 deploymen琠ac牯獳ra汬⁰athway猠w楴iin ve汳



䥭p牯red p牯r牥獳楯r⁴o⁴he⁵nde牧牡rua瑥 晡s
h楯i⁣ou牳攠f牯m⁷楴i楮i剡Ren獢ou牮r



䍵牲楣畬im⁤eve汯lmen琠epand楮i⁴he fash楯i⁰o牴fo汩o



䥮瑥g牡瑩rnf⁣u牲en琠de獩sn⁰牡捴楣攠th牯rgh 瑨e⁩ vo汶emen琠o映p牡捴楴楯ne牳⽤e獩sne牳

Issues



䝥nde爠rmba污lce



WP/d楶e牳r瑹⁤emands



䥮捲敡獥d⁡dm楳獩on猻ss
u晦楣ien捹f⁷o牫⁰污捥men瑳

AB
-

230310

AB10/03/
09f

Quality Team

Final Version January 2010

15



Transition to digital printing



Teaching and Subject Leader workload



Technical training support