Course

ECE 1352 Analog Integrated Circuits I
Professor
–
K. Phang
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers

term paper
Yiqian Ying
930360680
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
University of Toronto
Nov. 12, 2001
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
2
of 17
Chopper Stabilized Amplifie
rs
Abstract
—
In this paper, historical background and fundamental concept of
chopper stabilized amplifiers are first introduced. Then effects of noise and residual offset
are analyzed. Several techniques to reduce the residual offset are proposed. Also so
me of
the disadvantages of chopper stabilization technique, as compared to correlated double
sampling technique, are stated. Applications of chopper stabilized amplifiers, some latest
research findings, and some new products utilizing chopper stabilization
technique are
given in the last two sections.
I. Introduction and Historical Background
Chopper stabilization (CHS) is a modulation technique that can be employed to
reduce the effects o
f op

amp imperfections including noise (mainly 1/f and thermal noise)
and the input

referred dc offset voltage. Other techniques include autozeroing (AZ),
which is a sampling technique, and correlated double sampling (CDS), which is a
particular case of AZ
. Ideally, a chopper stabilized amplifier can eliminate dc offset and
low

frequency (primarily 1/f) noise.
The CHS approach was first developed by E. A. Goldberg in 1948 [1]. Actual
implementations have evolved from tube types through silicon hybrids [2].
As IC
technologies advance, chopper stabilization can easily be realized on

chip. Early chopper
efforts involved switched ac coupling of the input signal and synchronous demodulation
of the ac signal to re

establish the dc signal. While these amplifiers a
chieved very low
offset, low offset drift, and very high gain, they had limited bandwidth and required
filtering to remove the large ripple voltages generated by chopping. Chopper stabilized
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
3
of 17
amplifiers solved the bandwidth limitations by combining the chop
per amplifier with a
conventional wideband amplifier that remained in the signal path. However, simple
chopper stabilized designs are capable of inverting operation only since the stabilizing
amplifier is connected to the non

inverting input of the wideban
d amplifier [2].
II. Basic Principle
The CHS technique uses an ac carrier to amplitude modulate the input signal. The
principle of chopper amplification is illustrated in Fig. 1 with input V
in
, output V
out,
and A
is the gain of a linear memoryless amplif
ier. The signal m
1
(t) and m
2
(t) are modulating
and demodulating carriers with period T=1/f
chop
where f
chop
is the chopper frequency.
Also, V
OS
and V
N
denote deterministic dc offset and noise. It is assumed that the input
signal is bandlimited to half of t
he chopper frequency f
chop
so no signal aliasing occurs.
Fig. 1.
The Chopper amplification principle
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
4
of 17
Basically, amplitude modulation using a square

wave carrier transposes the signal
to higher frequencies where there is no 1/f noise, and then the modulate
d signal is
demodulated back to the baseband after amplification.
For the periodic carrier with a period of T and 50% duty cycle, its Fourier
representation is
.
(1)
Its k

th Fourier

coefficients, M
k
, have the property:
.
(2)
The modulated signal is the product of the initial signal and equation (1). The spectrum of
the product V
in
m
1
(t) in Fig. 1 shows that the signal is transposed to the odd harmonic
frequencies of the modulating signal. After amp
lification, the modulated signal is then
demodulated by multiplying m
2
(t) to obtain
(3)
Fig. 2 shows the Fourier transform of this noiseless demodulated output signal.
Fig. 2.
Fourier transform of the
ideal noiseless output signal
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
5
of 17
To recover the original signal in amplified form, the demodulated signal is applied to a
low

pass filter with a cut

off frequency slightly above the input signal bandwidth, in this
case, half of the chopper frequency.
Noise a
nd offset are modulated only once. If S
N
(f) denotes the power spectral
density (PSD) of the noise and offset, then the PSD of (V
OS
+ V
N
)
m
2
(t) is:
(4)
So noise and offset are translated to the odd harmonic frequencies of
the modulating
signal, leaving the chopper amplifier ideally without any offset or low

frequency noise.
Assume the input signal V
in
is a dc signal, if the amplifier has an infinite
bandwidth and no delay, the signal at its output, V
A
, is simply the same
square wave with
an amplitude A
V
in
and the signal after demodulation is again a dc signal of value A
V
in
.
In a less ideal situation, the amplifier would have a limited bandwidth, say up to twice the
chopper frequency with a constant gain of A and is zero
elsewhere (ideal low

pass). As
shown in Fig. 3 [3], the amplifier output signal V
A
(t) is now a sinewave corresponding to
the fundamental component of the chopped dc signal with an amplitude (4/
)(A
V
in
). The
output V
out
of the second modulator is then a re
ctified sinewave containing even

order
harmonic frequencies components. The output will have to be low

pass filtered to recover
the desired amplified signal. After low

pass filtering, the dc value is (8/
2
)(A
V
in
), thus
an approximately 20% degradation on
dc gain. So a larger bandwidth of the main
amplifier results in a bigger dc gain.
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
6
of 17
Fig. 3.
Effect of limited bandwidth of the amplifier on a dc input signal
Delay introduced by the main amplifier could also cause degradation on overall
dc gain. For exampl
e, if the amplifier has an infinite bandwidth but introduces a constant
delay of T/4 while the input and output modulators are in phase, the output signal would
be a chopped cosinewave, without a dc component and containing only odd harmonics,
i.e., the ov
erall dc gain of the chopper stabilized amplifier is zero. If there is the same
constant delay between the input and output modulators, i.e.,
t in Fig. 1 equals T/4, the
output signal is a rectified sinewave. These conclude that in order to maximize dc ga
in of
the chopper amplifier, the phase shift between the two modulators needs to match
precisely the phase shift introduced by the main amplifier [3].
III. Effect of Chopping on Amplifier Noises
The effect of chopping on both thermal white noise and fli
ck noise is analyzed in
this section.
First, let f
c
be the cut

off frequency of the main amplifier in Fig. 1. Note that the
definition for cutoff frequency widely used is the frequency for which the transfer
function magnitude is decreased by the factor
1/
from its maximum value [4].
Typically, f
c
equals five times the chopper frequency f
chop
= 1/T. In baseband
(
), S
CS
in equation (4) can be approximated by a white noise PSD
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
7
of 17
(5)
And
for
,
can be further approximated to
for
and
.
(6)
So the baseband PSD of the noise is nearly constant for l
arge f
c
of the main amplifier.
And the chopped

modulated PSD is smaller than but asymptotically approaches the PSD
of the original white noise.
For 1/f noise, the input PSD is given by
(7)
where f
k
is the amplifier corner f
requency. If we substitute this input PSD into equation
(2), i.e., when the low

frequency noise is translated higher frequencies, the odd
harmonics of f
chop
, the 1/f noise pole disappears from the baseband. Simulation shows
that the chopped 1/f noise PSD i
n baseband can be approximated by [3]
(8)
The total input

referred residual noise in the baseband for a typical amplifier is the
sum of equation (6) and equation (8), given by
for
and
.
(9)
It is reasonable to choose the chopper frequency f
chop
equal to the amplifier corner
frequency f
k
. The resulting white noise PSD increase is less than 6dB. This has been
verified experimentally according to [3].
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
8
of 17
IV. Effect of Chopping on Residual Offset
If the modulators are realized with MOS switches, every time a switch turns off,
the charges in its conducting channel exit through the source and drain terminals. This
nonideality is called charge injection, al
so known as clock feedthrough. It causes spikes
at the input of the main amplifier. This residual offset voltage will be amplified then
modulated by the output modulator. A typical spike signal in time domain is shown in
Fig. 4(a) where
represents the ti
me constant of the parasitic spikes, T again is the
chopper period. Since only the odd harmonics of the chopper frequency contributes to the
residual offset, the spike signal has an odd symmetry.
Fig. 4
. (a) Spike signal at the input of the amplifier (b) s
pectra of spike signal of chopper

modulated signal
with amplifier bandwidth characteristics
The time constant
in general is much smaller than T/2, so the energy of the spike
signal concentrates at frequencies higher than the chopper frequency. The spec
tra of the
spikes and the chopper

modulated signal at the input of the main amplifier are shown in
Fig. 4(b). The input

referred offset can be calculated as [3]:
(10)
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
9
of 17
Using an amplifier with a bandwidth much larger than th
e chopper frequency f
chop
results in a dc gain approaching maximum gain A, as discussed in section II. However,
this also leads to a maximum output offset voltage since almost all of the spectral
components of the spike signal will contribute. A good compr
omise is to limit the
bandwidth of the amplifier to twice the chopper frequency. The overall dc gain will be
(8/
2
)
A = 0.81A, only 19% degradation while the offset voltage is reduced drastically.
The new value is [3]
.
(11)
V. Techniques to Reduce Residual Offset Voltage
There are several circuit techniques to reduce the residual offset voltage caused by
charge injection. A simple MOS switch is shown in Fig. 5 to help the analysis.
Fig. 5.
Basic MOS switch
C
h
corresponds to
the total capacitance at the switch drain (the hold capacitor) and C
p
corresponds to the total parasitic capacitance at the source.
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
10
of 17
A. Complementary Switches
This is the simplest technique. The theory is that the charges released by one
switch are absorb
ed by the complementary switch to build its channel. However, it is
difficult to match precisely channel charges of an n

MOS device and a p

MOS device.
Phase jitter between the two complementary clocks further degrades the charge
mismatch.
B. Larger Capaci
tance
A more efficient technique is to make C
p
much larger than C
h
and choose a slow
clock transition. Most of the channel charges will be attracted to the larger capacitor C
p
,
leaving almost zero charges to C
h
on the output side. Disadvantage of this tec
hnique is
that it sets a limit on the maximum clock frequency.
C. Fully Differential Structure
An example of a fully differential structure is shown in Fig. 6. If we purposely set
C
p
= C
h
, the resulting voltage appears as a common

mode voltage and is re
jected. This
usually requires the generation of delayed

cutoff clock phases [3].
Fig. 6.
Fully differential structure
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
11
of 17
D. Multistage Cascading
Several single

stage amplifiers can be cascaded to achieve high gain and speed. A
sample circuit is sho
wn in Fig. 7.
Fig. 7.
Multistage offset cancellation circuit
Switches S
1
, S
2
, …, S
N
are opened successively. The effective offset voltage is
only determined by charge injection of switch S
N
into capacitor C
N
in the last stage.
Offset voltages at earlier
stages get cancelled. The equivalent input

referred offset is
(12)
where q
inj
is the injected charge. This offset voltage is much smaller than that obtained
for a single

stage low

gain amplifier.
VI. Disadvantages of Choppe
r Stabilization
Chopper stabilization technique aids low frequency amplifier noise performance
and eliminates many of the careful design and layout procedures necessary in a classic
differential approach. The most significant trade

off is increased complex
ity. The
chopping circuitry requires significant attention for good results. Additionally, the ac
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
12
of 17
dynamics of chopper stabilized amplifiers are complex if input bandwidths greater than
the carrier chopping frequency are required.
Comparing to correlated do
uble sampling (CDS) technique which can be used to
enhance the effective gain of the op

amps, CHS technique causes the op

amp to amplify a
higher

frequency signal, hence its effective gain is usually reduced as discussed in section
II. Also the dc offset o
f a chopper stabilized amplifier is not eliminated, only modulated
to higher frequencies. CDS is the method of choice when high dc gain and maximum
signal swing are desired; In contrast, CHS is preferable for continuous

time systems and
when low baseband n
oise is a critical requirement.
VII. A Practical Implementation of Chopper Modulator
A practical realization of input and output chopper modulators is presented in Fig.
8 below [3]. The four switches are controlled by complementary phases. Capacitance C
in
represents the differential input capacitance of the main amplifier.
Fig. 8.
Implementation of the input and output chopper modulators
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
13
of 17
VIII. Applications
Chopper stabilized amplifiers are a part of the design for A/D converters that are
immune
from the influence of low

frequency noise at the modulator input. The
comparators have been realized by chopper

stabilized amplifiers to reduce the effect of
the offset voltage of the MOS amplifiers since the 70’s [5].
In general, chopper stabilized ampl
ifiers are low

noise continuous

time amplifiers
useful for amplifying dc and very low frequency signals, mainly used for instrumentation
application such as biomedical electronics and optoelectronics. Often the design objective
is to reach the microvolt le
vel for both offset and noise, with a bandwidth limited to a few
hundred Hz while maintaining the power consumption below 100
W [3].
One typical application example is capacitive sensors for measurement of
acceleration and pressure. Utilization of choppe
r stabilization removes the effects of
offset, 1/f noise and switch charge injection. High resolution and low drift can be
achieved [6].
Edge detector of image

sensors can also be chopped

stabilized. With CDS readout
technique, two dimensional photodiode
array can be efficiently build with only one
readout circuit providing a bi

directional edge detection capability for high resolution
image sensing applications operating at high frequencies [7].
IX. Latest Research and Products
A latest research paper i
ntroduced generalized chopper stabilization. Traditional
chopper stabilization is used in continuous

time and switched capacitor filtering [8]. The
concept of CHS can be extended to linear dynamical and certain types of nonlinear
circuits proved by [9].
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
14
of 17
Switched capacitors are often sensitive to parasitic capacitances from either
terminal of the capacitors to the ground. A parasitic insensitive solution for a fully
balanced circuit is shown in Fig. 9 [9]; The symbol for the chopper and a traditional
cho
pper stabilized fully balanced amplifier are shown in Fig. 10.
Fig. 9.
A parasitic

insensitive implementation for fully balanced circuits containing op

amps
Fig. 10.
(a)circuit symbol for the chopper, ( b) traditional chopper stabilized fully bala
nced amplifier
Another paper proposed substitution of track

and

hold (T/H) for the demodulator
of a conventional chopper stabilized amplifier. The advantage consists in the cancellation
of the amplifier input offset, low

frequency input noise components,
and residual offsets
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
15
of 17
due to input switching spikes, without requiring any low

pass filtering. One requirement
is that the input signal spectrum bandwidth is smaller than 0.2 times the Nyquist
frequency. However, this approach suffers a white

noise degradat
ion due to the hold
function; this degradation is minimized when maximum allowable duty cycle is 0.5 and
the amplifier bandwidth is at its minimum [10].
This year, many companies released new products utilizing CHS technique. For
example, The A3425LK dual
chopper

stabilized, ultra

sensitive, bipolar Hall

effect
switch of Allegro Microsystems is an extremely temperature

stable and stress

resistant
sensor. Its superior high

temperature performance is made possible through dynamic
offset cancellation by CHS,
which reduces the residual offset voltage caused by device
overmolding, temperature dependencies, and thermal stress [11].
In July of 2001, company Intersil released its new product ICL7650. It is said to
bring “a new era in glitch

free chopper stabilized
amplifiers” [12]. A single full

time
main amplifier is used to avoid any output glitches; And input switching glitches are
minimized by careful area

and charge

balancing on the network of input switches. The
chopper operation is performed by means of a n
ulling amplifier which shares on input
with the main amplifier [12].
X. Conclusion
Chopping stabilization is one of the two major techniques for suppression of the
low

frequency noise. Chopping stabilization is preferred over the other technique,
autozer
oing, when the system is linear and low baseband noise is the most important
requirement. Chopper stabilized amplifiers are best suited for low

power, portable, very
low

noise, very small offset and offset drift, high performance applications such as
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
16
of 17
elect
ronic sensors. New products that apply chopping stabilization technique are available
every year. Usage of this technique will continue to be broadened as more researches are
made on this topic.
Chopper Stabilized Amplifiers
by Yiqian Ying
Page
17
of 17
References
1.
Jim Williams
,
Application Consideration and Circuits for a New Chopper

Stabilized
Op Amp
, Linear Technology online publications, March 1985, Available at:
http://www.linear

tech.com
/pub/document.html?pub_type=app&document=16
2.
Auto

Zero Amplifiers
, Products and Datasheets Whitepapers, Nov. 2001, [cited Nov.
8, 2001], Available at:
http://www.analog.com/s
upport/standard_linear/white_autozero.html
3.
C. C. Enz and G. C. Temes,
Circuit techniques for reducing the effects of op

amp
imperfections: autozeroing, correlated double sampling, and chopper stabilization
.
Proceedings of the IEEE, Vol. 84, No. 11, pp. 15
84

1614, November 1996
4.
J. W. Nilsson and S. A. Riedel,
Electric Circuits
, fifth edition, Addison Wesley, 1996
5.
Kh. Hadidi, V. S. Tso and G. C. Temes,
Fast successive

approximation A/D
converters
, IEEE 1990 Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, pp. 6.1.1

6.
1.4
6.
B. K. Marlow, D. C. Greager, R. kemp and M. B. Moore, Highly sensitive
capacitance measurement for sensors, Electronics Letters, Vol. 29, No. 21, pp. 1844

1845, October 1993
7.
J. B. Kuo, T. L. Chou, and E. J. Wong, BiCMOS edge detector with correlated

do
uble

sampling readout circuit for pattern recognition neural network, Electronics
Letter, Vol. 27, No. 14, pp. 1248

1250, July 1991
8.
K

C. Hsieh, P. R. Gray, D. Senderowicz, and D. G. Messerschmitt,
A low

noise
chopper

stabilized differential switched

capaci
tor filtering technique
, IEEE Journal
on Solid

state Circuits, Vol. SC

16, No. 6, December 1981
9.
L. Toth and Y. Tsividis,
Generalized chopper stabilization
, IEEE, I

540 to I

543,
September 2001
10.
A. Bilotti and G. Monreal, Chopper

stabilized amplifiers with
a track

and

hold signal
demodulator, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems
—
I: Fundamental Theory
and Applications, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 490

495, April 1999
11.
3425 datasheet, Allegro Microsystems, January. 2001, Available at:
http://www.allegromicro.com/datafile/3425.pdf
12.
P. Bradshaw,
The ICL7650S: a new era in glitch

free chopper stabilized amplifiers
,
Application Note, Intersil, July 2001, Available at:
http://www.intersil.com/data/AN/AN0/AN053/AN053.pdf
Σχόλια 0
Συνδεθείτε για να κοινοποιήσετε σχόλιο